is dwarfed by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is dwarfed by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that one thing is significantly smaller or less important compared to another. Example: "The budget for the new project is dwarfed by the funding allocated for research and development."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But it is dwarfed by a different question: Is this group's work effective?

The New York Times

True, French cinema is dwarfed by Hollywood.

The Economist

Sony is dwarfed by Matsushita in the Japanese market.

The Economist

The program's $7.5 billion budget is dwarfed by the need.

The Economist

And the agency is dwarfed by some existing police forces.

The Economist

An apartment building in Chelsea is dwarfed by new construction.

The New York Times

Yet her purse is dwarfed by her strong hands.

The New York Times - Sports

The £7m we spend is dwarfed by our competitors.

The Guardian - Business

But the slaughter in Rwanda, in turn, "is dwarfed by the problem of AIDS in Africa.

Stanford University

In Starke, the atheists' monument is dwarfed by the Ten Commandments.

The New York Times

He is dwarfed by his younger guests: politicians seeking advice from the last living founder.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "is dwarfed by" to effectively highlight a significant difference in size, scale, or importance between two entities.

Common error

Avoid using "is dwarfed by" when the difference between the two things is not substantial. Ensure a noticeable contrast exists to justify its use.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is dwarfed by" functions as a comparative expression in the passive voice, indicating that one entity is significantly smaller, less important, or less impactful than another. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Academia

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is dwarfed by" is a grammatically sound and commonly used construction for emphasizing a considerable disparity between two entities. Ludwig AI confirms that it is correct and usable in written English. Predominantly found in News & Media, academic and formal business contexts, this phrase effectively highlights differences in size, scale, or importance. When using this phrase, ensure that the contrast is significant. Alternatives like "is overshadowed by" or "is eclipsed by" can be used for similar effect. Its widespread usage across authoritative sources underscores its reliability in formal communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is dwarfed in comparison with

Synonymous but more formal.

is overshadowed by

Emphasizes being less prominent or important.

is eclipsed by

Suggests a complete obscuring of one thing by another.

is paled in comparison to

Highlights the diminished significance of something.

is greatly exceeded by

Highlights the amount that one thing surpasses another.

is insignificant compared to

Focuses on the lack of importance relative to something else.

is made to seem small by

Describes the effect of something making something else appear less significant.

is trivial next to

Indicates a minor or negligible quality in comparison.

is smaller than

A straightforward comparison of size or amount.

is reduced by

Indicates a diminishing effect due to something else.

FAQs

How can I use "is dwarfed by" in a sentence?

Use "is dwarfed by" to show that something is much smaller or less significant compared to something else. For example, "The local company's revenue "is dwarfed by" that of the multinational corporation".

What are some alternatives to "is dwarfed by"?

You can use alternatives like "is overshadowed by", "is eclipsed by", or "is paled in comparison to" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "is dwarfed by" or "is dwarfed with"?

"Is dwarfed by" is the correct phrasing. "Is dwarfed with" is grammatically incorrect in this context.

What's the difference between "is dwarfed by" and "is smaller than"?

"Is smaller than" is a simple comparison of size. "Is dwarfed by" implies a much larger difference in scale, suggesting the first item is almost insignificant in comparison to the second.