is devoid of significance

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is devoid of significance" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe something that lacks meaning or importance. Example: "The argument presented in the essay is devoid of significance, as it fails to address the main issue at hand."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

The intensity of immunostaining showed a slight increase during the LS in all the represented epithelia, in particular in the DGE, but these changes were devoid of significance.

BMC Veterinary Research

Albeit a small decrease in the intensity and the percentage of cells with positive nuclei in both FEA stroma and myometrium compared to normal endometrium, the differences in PR expression in these compartments were devoid of significance (Table  3).

BMC Veterinary Research

For everyone," is devoid of meaning.

Vice

The first possibility is that the cadherin-bound/Wnt-bound β-catenin intersection is devoid of physiological significance.

Plosone

But I think she's wrong to assume social networking is devoid of a "cohesive narrative and long-term significance".

TechCrunch

No wonder it is devoid of visitors.

The Economist

Yet the film is devoid of them.

The New Yorker

The region is devoid of vegetation.

The Guardian

This alternative history is devoid of merit.

The Guardian - Opinion

But Amin is devoid of any principles.

The Guardian - Opinion

"The landscape is devoid of atmospheric subtlety.

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "is devoid of significance" when you want to emphasize that something completely lacks importance, impact, or meaning in a particular context. It's stronger than simply saying something is "unimportant".

Common error

Avoid using "is devoid of significance" in casual conversation or informal writing. Simpler phrases like "doesn't matter" or "is meaningless" are often more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is devoid of significance" functions as a predicate adjective, modifying a noun or pronoun to indicate a complete lack of importance or meaning. Ludwig AI suggests the phrase "is meaningless" as an alternative.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

45%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is devoid of significance" is a grammatically correct construction used to express a complete lack of importance or meaning. Ludwig AI confirms its usability, though it's relatively rare and more suitable for formal and scientific contexts. Common alternatives include "lacks importance" and "is meaningless". While emphasizing a complete absence, be mindful of its formal tone and avoid overuse in casual settings. This phrase is best reserved for situations where precision and impact are desired in conveying the absence of value or consequence.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lacks importance

This alternative uses simpler vocabulary to convey the same meaning; it replaces "devoid of significance" with "lacks importance".

is meaningless

This phrase is a more direct and concise way of saying something has no significance; it replaces the entire phrase with a single adjective.

holds no importance

This alternative rephrases the concept, emphasizing the absence of importance; it uses a verb-based construction.

is of no consequence

This alternative uses a more formal tone, focusing on the lack of consequence rather than significance.

is inconsequential

This is a single-word adjective that captures the meaning of lacking significance in a slightly more formal way.

is immaterial

This alternative suggests that something doesn't matter or make a difference; focuses more on relevance.

bears no weight

This metaphoric phrase indicates a lack of importance by comparing significance to physical weight.

is without merit

This alternative emphasizes a lack of value or worth, implying a stronger negative connotation.

is negligible

This alternative indicates that something is so small or unimportant it can be disregarded, focusing on the size of the significance.

is irrelevant

This alternative specifies that something is not connected or pertinent to the current situation, rather than lacking importance in general.

FAQs

How can I use "is devoid of significance" in a sentence?

You can use "is devoid of significance" to describe something that lacks importance or meaning. For example: "The data collected during the experiment "was devoid of significance", as it did not support the hypothesis."

What are some alternatives to "is devoid of significance"?

You can use alternatives like "lacks importance", "is meaningless", or "is inconsequential" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "lacks significance" or "is devoid of significance"?

"Lacks significance" is generally more concise and commonly used. "Is devoid of significance" is more emphatic, highlighting a complete absence of importance.

In what contexts is "is devoid of significance" most appropriate?

"Is devoid of significance" is most appropriate in formal writing, scientific reports, and academic papers where precision and emphasis are needed. It can sound overly formal in casual conversation.