is ascertained with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is ascertained with" is not commonly used in written English and may sound awkward.
It can be used when discussing the process of determining or finding out something in conjunction with another factor or method. Example: "The accuracy of the results is ascertained with the help of advanced statistical methods."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

The accuracy of registration is ascertained with the total root-mean-square-error (RMS error) as a measure.

International Journal of Coal Science & Technology

The presence of the illusion is ascertained with participants' scores and temperature changes of the real arm.

Plosone

Previous studies [ 37- 54, 66, 70- 75] 75] have shown that the proportion of cancer free families varies with the type of index cancer, with the manner in which the index subject is ascertained, with the age of the index subject and with the size of the family.

BMC Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Assuming further that missense mutations and nonsense mutations are ascertained with an equal probability, the ascertainment depth of missense mutations is Sn/ Tn.

Genome Biology and Evolution

These voters should not be disfranchised where their intent may be ascertained with reasonable certainty, simply because the chad they punched did not completely dislodge from the ballot.

The New York Times

Our courts have repeatedly held that, where the intention of the voter can be ascertained with reasonable certainty from his ballot, that intention will be given effect even though the ballot is not strictly in conformity with the law...

The New York Times

It is that contrary to what you may have gleaned from the literary deconstructionists, there is a truth, and if it can't be ascertained with total assurance, it can certainly be closely approached, like the calculus approaching the curve.

The New York Times - Books

It hinted broadly that dimpled chads should be counted, quoting an Illinois Supreme Court opinion declaring that "voters should not be disfranchised where their intent may be ascertained with reasonable certainty".

The New York Times

But the power of reason to prove much of what we know is weak, and Hume denied that our beliefs about the world could be ascertained with anything like scientific certainty.

The New Yorker

But Gore aides were gratified to find that the court quoted from an Illinois Supreme Court opinion that "voters should not be disfranchised where their intent may be ascertained with reasonable certainty, simply because the chad they punched did not completely dislodge from the ballot".

The New York Times

Asserting the paramount importance of an accurate vote count, the court cited with approval the words of the Illinois court: "Voters should not be disfranchised where their intent may be ascertained with reasonable certainty, simply because the chad they punched did not completely dislodge from the ballot," the justices ruled.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is ascertained with", ensure that the method or tool being used to ascertain something is clearly specified to avoid ambiguity. For instance, "The authenticity of the artwork is ascertained with carbon dating techniques" provides a clearer understanding than simply saying, "The authenticity is ascertained with techniques."

Common error

Avoid using "is ascertained with" in casual writing or conversations. Simpler alternatives like "is found with" or "is determined by" are often more appropriate for informal settings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is ascertained with" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a particular piece of information or a conclusion is reached through a specific method or tool. Ludwig indicates that it is not so common in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

66.66%

News & Media

33.33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is ascertained with" is used to describe how something is discovered or determined using a specific method or tool. Ludwig suggests that while grammatically correct, the phrase is not very common in written English. It is most frequently found in scientific and formal contexts. When using the phrase, ensure clarity by specifying the method or tool used. Simpler alternatives like "is determined by" or "is established through" may be more appropriate in informal settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is determined by

Emphasizes the causal relationship where something is decided or influenced by a specific factor.

is established through

Highlights the process by which something is confirmed or proven.

is identified using

Focuses on the tool or technique employed to recognize or detect something.

is measured with

Specifically refers to the act of quantifying something using a particular instrument or standard.

is verified by

Underscores the act of confirming the truth or accuracy of something.

is confirmed via

Similar to "is verified by" but suggests a more formal or official confirmation process.

is validated through

Emphasizes the process of demonstrating the soundness or legitimacy of something.

is diagnosed with

Specifically used in medical contexts to indicate the identification of a condition.

is assessed using

Highlights the use of an evaluation method to determine the state or condition of something.

is evaluated with

Focuses on judging the value or quality of something by employing a particular criterion.

FAQs

What does "is ascertained with" mean?

The phrase "is ascertained with" means that something is discovered, determined, or found out by using a specific method, tool, or piece of information.

What are some alternatives to "is ascertained with"?

Alternatives include "is determined by", "is established through", or "is identified using", depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "is ascertained by" instead of "is ascertained with"?

Yes, "is ascertained by" is also correct and often more appropriate when the focus is on the cause or agent rather than the instrument. The choice depends on the specific context.

How can I use "is ascertained with" in a sentence?

For example, "The diagnosis of the disease "is ascertained with" a blood test" shows how a specific test helps in determining the diagnosis.