is adequate to explain

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is adequate to explain" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing whether something is sufficient or satisfactory to clarify a particular point or concept. Example: "The evidence presented in the report is adequate to explain the observed phenomena."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

And it remains to this day an open question whether a purely microscopic theory is available which is adequate to explain the whole range of chemical phenomena.

SEP

This result shows that the dust grain model of WD2001 is adequate to explain the halo surface brightness of GRB031203 for scattering dust at the distance of 882 pc.

Earth, Planets and Space

In this report, we examined the directional synaptic responses in the SBACs and tested key components of the two proposed models and found that neither model is adequate to explain the existence of directional signals in the SBAC.

Plosone

The large jump in LnP(D) values between K = 1 and K = 2 followed by small changes between K = 2 and K = 3 suggest that K = 2 is adequate to explain the data and is also the most parsimonious.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

I end with a brief review of adaptive functions proposed for music, concluding that no one selective force (e.g., sexual selection) is adequate to explaining all aspects of human music.

Cognition

Many pantheists argue that physical conceptions are adequate to explain the entire cosmos.

SEP

The constructed models were adequate to explain the relationships between independent variables and responses.

Carbohydrate Polymers

(7) The abovementioned eight points are adequate to explain the electrical conduction through disordered macromolecule but not to DNA.

Nanoscale Research Letters

The process modelling confirmed that quadratic models were adequate to explain the behaviour of the assessed variables (R2 ≥ 0.94 and Q2 ≥ 0.75).

Chemosphere

Quantities of leachable sulphur in the abandoned workings of 0.02 0.03% are adequate to explain the observed concentrations of sulphate in the first flush, and this figure is tentatively supported by laboratory analyses.

Journal of Contaminant Hydrology

Habitat associations were predictable among estuaries with moderate to high sensitivity and low percentages of false positives indicating that simple, physical factors were adequate to explain the spatial distribution pattern of intertidal crabs.

Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "is adequate to explain", ensure that you provide sufficient evidence or reasoning to support the claim of adequacy. Avoid vague assertions without concrete examples or data.

Common error

Avoid using "is adequate to explain" when the evidence is preliminary or incomplete. Instead, qualify your statement with phrases like "may be adequate" or "appears adequate based on current data" to avoid overstating the strength of the explanation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is adequate to explain" functions as a predicate adjective phrase. It asserts that a particular model, theory, or factor possesses the necessary qualities to provide a satisfactory explanation for a given phenomenon. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

95%

Encyclopedias

3%

News & Media

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is adequate to explain" is a grammatically correct and usable expression, primarily found in formal and scientific writing. According to Ludwig, this phrase is suitable when assessing whether a concept sufficiently clarifies a specific subject. While the phrase itself is accurate, ensure there's enough support before using the phrase in your writing. While common in scientific contexts, it's also important to be aware of overstating adequacy without providing evidence. By using this phrase accurately and backing it up, you can ensure your writing is both precise and credible.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

suffices to explain

Replaces "adequate" with "suffices", implying a minimal level of acceptability for explanation.

is sufficient to account for

Substitutes "explain" with "account for", shifting the focus to providing a comprehensive explanation.

is capable of explaining

Replaces "adequate" with "capable", focusing on the inherent ability to explain.

is able to elucidate

Uses "elucidate" instead of "explain", suggesting a more detailed and clarifying explanation.

serves to clarify

Focuses on the clarifying function, rather than the completeness of the explanation.

provides an explanation for

Shifts the focus to the existence of an explanation, rather than its adequacy.

can shed light on

Emphasizes the illuminating aspect of explanation, suggesting a revealing of understanding.

helps to understand

Focuses on improving understanding, rather than providing a complete explanation.

offers insight into

Highlights the provision of insight, implying a deeper level of understanding.

goes some way towards explaining

Indicates a partial explanation, rather than a complete or adequate one.

FAQs

How can I use "is adequate to explain" in a sentence?

Use "is adequate to explain" when you want to state that something provides a sufficient explanation for a phenomenon or situation. For example, "The model "is adequate to explain" the observed data."

What are some alternatives to "is adequate to explain"?

Some alternatives include "suffices to explain", "is sufficient to account for", or "is capable of explaining". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct, "is adequate to explain" or "is sufficient to explain"?

Both "is adequate to explain" and "is sufficient to explain" are correct and largely interchangeable. "Sufficient" might imply a slightly higher standard than "adequate", but in most contexts, they convey the same meaning.

When should I use "is adequate to explain" versus "is able to explain"?

"Is adequate to explain" emphasizes that something meets a certain threshold of explanation, while "is able to explain" simply indicates the capability to explain. Use "is adequate to explain" when you want to highlight that the explanation is not just possible, but also satisfactory.