is adequate for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is adequate for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is sufficient or satisfactory for a particular purpose or need. Example: "The current budget is adequate for covering all necessary expenses for the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Blockbuster is adequate for new releases.

The New York Times

A television-quality tape is adequate for that purpose.

The New York Times

One inch an hour is adequate for a home lawn.

The New York Times

Such an action alone is adequate for me to declare a holy war or a revolution.

The New Yorker

Still, the trunk is adequate for a couple of suitcases and a set of Callaway clubs.

The New York Times

"Please continue your excellent reporting; the detail given is adequate for a majority of the population.

The Guardian - Opinion

How can you tell if a respirator is adequate for you needs?

The New York Times

The cargo space behind the third-row seat is adequate for grocery bags or sports gear.

The New York Times

A single two-door unit is adequate for a standard door frame.

The New York Times

"My government does not believe that the current national anthem is adequate for these purposes".

The Guardian - Sport

In most cases its output is adequate for whatever cooling or heating is necessary.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is adequate for", ensure the context clearly defines the standard or requirement being met. Specificity enhances clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "is adequate for" when a stronger term like "is excellent for" or "is ideal for" is more accurate. Overstating can diminish credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is adequate for" functions as a predicative adjective phrase, modifying a noun or pronoun to indicate sufficiency or suitability. Ludwig provides examples demonstrating its use in various contexts, confirming its adjectival role.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

41%

News & Media

38%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is adequate for" is a versatile expression used to indicate that something meets a minimum requirement or standard. Ludwig AI confirms it is grammatically sound and commonly used across various domains, particularly in science and news media. While it conveys sufficiency, it does not necessarily imply excellence, making it crucial to select the most accurate descriptor for your context. Consider alternatives such as "is sufficient for" or "is suitable for" to fine-tune the intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is sufficient for

Emphasizes meeting a requirement or need; slightly more formal.

is suitable for

Highlights appropriateness and fitness for a specific context.

is enough for

A more colloquial alternative, implying just the right amount.

is capable of

Focuses on the ability to perform a task or meet a demand.

is prepared for

Indicates readiness and anticipation of a certain situation.

is up to the task of

Suggests competence and ability to handle a challenging task.

meets the needs of

Directly addresses the satisfaction of specific requirements.

serves the purpose of

Emphasizes the functionality and utility for a particular aim.

fills the bill for

An idiomatic expression indicating suitability and satisfaction.

is on par with

Indicates a state of equality or comparability to the standard of the query

FAQs

How can I use "is adequate for" in a sentence?

Use "is adequate for" to describe something that meets the minimum requirements or is sufficient for a specific purpose. For instance, "The budget "is adequate for" the project's initial phase".

What are some alternatives to "is adequate for"?

Alternatives include "is sufficient for", "is enough for", or "is suitable for", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "is adequate for" and "is sufficient for"?

While similar, "is adequate for" suggests meeting a basic requirement, whereas "is sufficient for" implies meeting all requirements without necessarily exceeding them.

When is it appropriate to use "is adequate for" versus "is ideal for"?

"Is adequate for" is appropriate when something merely meets the necessary standards. Use "is ideal for" when something is perfectly suited and provides optimal results.