is accountable for assuring

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is accountable for assuring" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where someone is responsible for ensuring that something is done or maintained properly. Example: "The project manager is accountable for assuring that all deadlines are met and quality standards are upheld."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Who is accountable for failure?

The New York Times

"Who is accountable for this?

The Washington Post

Who is accountable for the police?

The Independent

Steve Richards: Who is accountable for the police?

The Independent

Who is accountable for the change?

Harvard Business Review

Who is accountable for delivering?

Forbes

An individual is accountable for providing an "invalid" constituent.

Journal of Cheminformatics

A service is accountable for providing an "invalid" generator.

Journal of Cheminformatics

Who is accountable for the DNA biobanks?

Forbes

Beyond this, she is accountable for her morally significant conduct.

SEP

Arno Sinjewel is accountable for determination of plasma haloperidol levels.

BMC Geriatrics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is accountable for assuring", clearly define the scope of responsibility to avoid ambiguity. Specify the exact actions or outcomes the person is accountable for.

Common error

Avoid assigning multiple individuals accountability for assuring the same outcome. This can lead to confusion and diffusion of responsibility. Clearly delineate individual roles and responsibilities.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is accountable for assuring" functions as a predicate describing responsibility for ensuring a specific outcome or action. While Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, example sentences highlight the underlying duty and potential consequences.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is accountable for assuring" is grammatically sound, yet somewhat formal, indicating a strong responsibility for ensuring a particular outcome. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. While no direct examples were found in the search data, related phrases offer alternatives for varying levels of formality. When using this phrase, clearly define the scope of responsibility to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is responsible for ensuring

Replaces "accountable" with "responsible", focusing on the duty to ensure something happens.

is accountable for guaranteeing

Combines accountability with the act of guaranteeing.

is tasked with ensuring

Emphasizes the assignment of a task to ensure a specific result.

is in charge of ensuring

Highlights the leadership role in guaranteeing a certain outcome.

takes responsibility for assuring

Emphasizes the act of taking ownership for ensuring a certain outcome.

is liable for ensuring

Focuses on the legal responsibility for ensuring a specific result.

is held responsible for ensuring

Highlights external expectations for ensuring something is done.

is committed to ensuring

Stresses dedication towards ensuring a certain outcome.

is duty-bound to assure

Implies a formal or ethical obligation to ensure something.

guarantees that

Expresses a firm assurance or promise of a particular outcome.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "is accountable for assuring"?

You can use alternatives like "is responsible for ensuring", "is tasked with ensuring", or "is in charge of ensuring depending on the context.

What does it mean to be "accountable for assuring" something?

It means you are responsible for ensuring something happens or is done correctly, and you will be held responsible if it does not.

Is it better to use "is accountable for ensuring" or "is responsible for ensuring"?

Both phrases are similar, but "is accountable for assuring" often implies a higher level of formal responsibility and potential consequences for failure than "is responsible for ensuring".

What are the potential drawbacks of using "is accountable for assuring"?

While grammatically correct, "is accountable for assuring" can sound somewhat formal or bureaucratic. In some contexts, simpler language might be more effective.