is a master of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is a master of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe someone who has exceptional skill or expertise in a particular area or field. Example: "She is a master of negotiation, always securing the best deals for her clients."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Arts

Sports

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Weschler is a master of narrative nonfiction.

The New York Times - Books

(Benjamin is a master of that).

The New Yorker

Ms Zimmerman is a master of optics.

The Economist

Brahms is a master of understatement.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Cronenberg is a master of special effects.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Switzerland is a master of labyrinthine defense.

The New York Times - Sports

She is a master of multitasking.

The New York Times

Updike is a master of these moods.

The New Yorker

Columbo is a master of reporting.

The New York Times

Darling is a master of understatement.

Independent

Peter Nadas is a master of physical descriptions.

The New York Times - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is a master of", ensure that the skill or area of expertise is clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For instance, "She is a master of negotiation" is clearer than "She is a master."

Common error

While "is a master of" is generally acceptable, avoid using it excessively in casual conversations or informal writing. Simpler alternatives like "is good at" or "excels in" might be more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is a master of" functions as a predicate adjective phrase, attributing a characteristic of expertise to a subject. This indicates a high degree of skill or proficiency. Ludwig examples show diverse applications, from describing artistic talent to strategic prowess.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

76%

Encyclopedias

8%

Arts

5%

Less common in

Sports

3%

Science

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is a master of" is a versatile and widely used expression to denote exceptional skill or expertise. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage across various domains, predominantly in news and media. While appropriate for formal contexts, it should be used judiciously in informal settings. Consider alternatives like "excels at" or "is an expert in" for nuanced expressions. Understanding these nuances ensures effective and precise communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is an expert in

Emphasizes specialized knowledge and authority.

is highly proficient in

Highlights a high degree of competence and skill.

is accomplished in

Suggests a recognized level of achievement and refinement.

is adept at

Implies skillfulness and resourcefulness.

is skilled in

A more general expression of competence.

excels at

Focuses on superior performance or achievement in a specific activity.

is a virtuoso of

Emphasizes exceptional technical skill and artistic flair.

is a wizard at

Implies almost magical skill or talent, is less formal.

is a connoisseur of

Refers to someone with expert knowledge and refined taste.

is at the top of their game in

Suggests peak performance and mastery, often used in sports or competitive contexts.

FAQs

How can I use "is a master of" in a sentence?

Use "is a master of" to describe someone with exceptional skill or expertise in a particular area. For example, "The chef "is a master of" French cuisine".

What are some alternatives to "is a master of"?

You can use alternatives such as "excels at", "is an expert in", or "is highly proficient in" depending on the specific context.

Is it appropriate to use "is a master of" in formal writing?

Yes, "is a master of" is suitable for formal writing, especially when emphasizing a high level of skill or expertise. However, consider the audience and context to ensure it aligns with the overall tone.

What's the difference between "is a master of" and "is good at"?

"Is a master of" implies a higher level of skill and expertise compared to "is good at". The former suggests exceptional proficiency, while the latter indicates a general level of competence.