Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
involve evidence of
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "involve evidence of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the necessity or requirement of proof or documentation in a particular context, such as legal, academic, or investigative scenarios. Example: "The research must involve evidence of the correlation between the two variables to support the hypothesis."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
Such evidence often involves evidence of injury or illness related pain, which may be difficult to assess and document by non-specialists; doctors typically provide evidence.
Science
The earliest unambiguous detection of M. tuberculosis involves evidence of the disease in the remains of bison in Wyoming dated to around 17,000 years ago.
Wiki
Blended learning, involving evidence of patient contact, team-based learning and practical skills are preferred CPC activities.
Science
77% of the respondents (474) favoured a 'mixed' model approach for CPC with a similar amount supporting the idea of minimum standard requirements which involved evidence of patient care.
Science
The majority of both cohorts surveyed favoured a 'mixed' model approach for CPC with a similar number supporting the idea of minimum standard requirements which involved evidence of patient care.
Science
The proportion of potential mating interactions involving evidence of female resistance did not differ significantly between treatment groups (Table S2 in Supplementary Material), indicating that differences in female sexual receptivity are unlikely to explain this reduced propensity to mate.
Science
And tensions flare when an unarmed person is involved, or evidence of wrongdoing is shoddy.
News & Media
We demonstrated variation in, and a reciprocal impact on, the fitness of both host and pathogen phenotype and genotype, an outcome dependent on the combinations of genotypes involved, and evidence of change over time.
Science
This can be quantified simply as a measure of time (ex. 0 hours, 1 hour, or 2 hour), or it may entail a host of other criteria involving other evidence of functionality or fitness for purpose.
Wiki
This will involve gathering additional evidence of the impact of IMCI on key health outcomes and the sensitization of key opinion leaders, such as doctors, senior staff from health and finance ministries, donors and politicians.
Science
More than a third involve suppression of evidence by police.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Consider replacing "involve evidence of" with stronger alternatives like "require proof of" or "necessitate validation of" to emphasize the importance of the evidence.
Common error
Avoid using "involve evidence of" in casual conversation or informal writing. It can sound overly formal and pretentious. Opt for simpler phrasing that conveys the same meaning.
Source & Trust
79%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "involve evidence of" functions as a connector, indicating that proof or supporting data is a necessary component or aspect of a process, claim, or investigation. It suggests that the presence of evidence is integral to the validity or credibility of something. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is correct and usable.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "involve evidence of" is grammatically correct and usable, primarily functioning to connect a claim, process, or investigation with the necessity of verifiable support. While not particularly common, its use is appropriate in formal, academic, and scientific contexts where the emphasis on evidence is paramount. As Ludwig AI points out, it indicates that proof or supporting data is a necessary component. When using the phrase, it's beneficial to specify the type of evidence to enhance clarity. While it's generally a correct phrase, you may consider stronger alternatives such as "require proof of" or "necessitate validation of" for greater impact. Avoid using the phrase in informal contexts where it can sound pretentious.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
necessitate proof of
Emphasizes the requirement for formal proof, making it more suitable for legal or academic contexts. It directly specifies that proof is needed, which is a stronger assertion than simply "involving evidence".
require substantiation of
Focuses on the need for supporting evidence, implying that claims or assertions must be backed up with credible data or documentation. It is more formal and precise than "involve evidence of".
entail documentation of
Highlights the need for formal records and documents as evidence. It is more specific than "involve evidence of" because it clarifies that the evidence should be in written or recorded form.
demand verification of
Stresses the importance of confirming the truth or accuracy of something through evidence. It suggests a more rigorous investigation or scrutiny compared to simply "involving evidence".
call for validation of
Indicates that evidence is needed to establish the validity or correctness of something, often used in scientific or technical contexts. It has a more technical connotation than "involve evidence of".
necessitate validation through
Similar to “call for validation of,” but it adds the “through” element, highlighting that the evidence must be a specific process or result of something (like an experiment).
rely upon proof of
This phrase points out that the reliability and trust in something comes from the evidence itself. More assertive than to "involve evidence of".
hinge on confirmation of
Implies that the outcome or success of something is directly determined by the confirmation of evidence. This puts a lot of emphasis on the role of evidence.
be contingent on verification of
Emphasizes the conditional aspect, indicating that something will only occur if the evidence is verified. It suggests a more conditional relationship than "involve evidence of".
be predicated on demonstration of
This is a more formal expression that says something is founded on the demonstration of evidence. It implies that something can only exist because it has evidence.
FAQs
How can I use "involve evidence of" in a sentence?
You can use "involve evidence of" to indicate that a particular process, claim, or investigation requires proof or supporting data. For example: "The research must involve evidence of the correlation between the two variables to support the hypothesis."
What are some alternatives to "involve evidence of"?
Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "require proof of", "entail documentation of", or "necessitate validation of".
When is it appropriate to use "involve evidence of"?
It is appropriate in formal writing, academic papers, legal documents, or any context where it's important to emphasize the need for verifiable support. Avoid using it in casual conversation or informal writing.
What is the difference between "involve evidence of" and "require evidence of"?
"Involve evidence of" suggests that evidence is a component or aspect of something, whereas "require evidence of" directly states that evidence is necessary or mandatory. The latter is a stronger assertion.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
79%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested