invitation-only

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "invitation-only" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to describe an event or gathering that is restricted to individuals who have received an invitation. Example: "The gala will be an exclusive, invitation-only event, ensuring a private atmosphere for all attendees."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

The service is invitation-only to start.

The New York Times - Tech

It is an invitation-only club.

The New York Times - Sports

It's an invitation-only shoot.

The Guardian - Sport

The event is invitation-only.

The New York Times

For now, it's free, but invitation-only.

The New York Times

It will be an invitation-only event.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

44 human-written examples

Invitation only.

The New York Times

By invitation only.

The New York Times

Jan . 9 Invitation only.

The New York Times

After-party invitation only.

The New York Times

Both parties are invitation only.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "invitation-only" to clearly communicate that an event, club, or service is restricted to those who have been specifically invited. This sets clear expectations for potential attendees or users.

Common error

Avoid using "invitation-only" when the event is open to a specific group (e.g., members) rather than strictly by individual invitation. Use "members-only" or "reserved for members" instead to accurately reflect the access criteria.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "invitation-only" functions primarily as an adjective, modifying a noun to indicate that something is restricted to those who have received an invitation. Ludwig provides several examples of this usage, confirming its adjectival role.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

76%

Wiki

8%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Science

3%

Academia

2%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "invitation-only" is a common and grammatically correct way to indicate that access to something is restricted to those who have received a specific invitation. As Ludwig AI confirms, it functions as an adjective, clearly communicating exclusivity and managing expectations. While predominantly found in news and media contexts, it maintains a neutral to professional tone and has readily available alternatives like "exclusive" or "private event". When using "invitation-only", ensure it accurately reflects the access criteria to avoid miscommunication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

by invitation only

Rephrases the original expression with slightly different syntax.

exclusive

Focuses on the selectiveness and high status associated with access.

reserved for select guests

Emphasizes that only a specific group of guests is permitted.

private event

Emphasizes the restricted nature of the occasion.

limited entry

Stresses that access is restricted due to space or other constraints.

members-only

Highlights that only members of a certain group are allowed.

restricted access

Focuses on the limited availability and controlled entry.

closed to the public

Highlights that the event is not open for anyone to attend.

VIP only

Highlights that only Very Important People can access it.

application required

Highlights the need for an application to access to the event or club.

FAQs

What does "invitation-only" mean?

The term "invitation-only" signifies that access to an event, group, or service is strictly limited to individuals who have received a direct invitation. It indicates exclusivity and restricted entry.

How can I use "invitation-only" in a sentence?

You can use it like this: "The gala is an "invitation-only" event, ensuring a private and exclusive atmosphere." Or: "Membership to the club is "by invitation only"".

What are some alternatives to "invitation-only"?

Alternatives include "exclusive", "private event", or "members-only", depending on the context and the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it redundant to say "by invitation only event"?

Saying "by invitation only event" is slightly redundant, but acceptable, as "invitation-only" already implies that access is limited to those who have been invited. A more concise version would be "invitation-only event".