interviewed with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "interviewed with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to the act of meeting with someone for the purpose of conducting an interview. For example, "I recently interviewed with an HR manager for a potential job opening."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Methods: Probands were interviewed with M-CIDI by lay interviewers.

Journal of Affective Disorders

He also interviewed with Tampa Bay.

The New York Times - Sports

Mora interviewed with N.F.L. and college teams.

The New York Times - Sports

Like Cottrell, Capers interviewed with the Jets.

The New York Times - Sports

The inmate was interviewed with permission of prison authorities.

The Washington Post

Ryan has interviewed with the Jets and the Rams.

The New York Times

A young slacker (Aaron Purvis) is interviewed with his mother.

The New Yorker

Showalter had interviewed with the Mets and the Cubs.

The New York Times - Sports

Mr. Tyre had interviewed with Accenture, formerly Andersen Consulting.

The New York Times

" 'I haven't interviewed with anybody,' " Edwards said Dungy would respond.

The New York Times - Sports

I interviewed with the head of a management consulting firm.

The New York Times - Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "interviewed with" when you want to clearly state that someone had a formal meeting for evaluation or information gathering. Be mindful of the context to ensure it aligns with the professional or formal nature of interviewing.

Common error

Avoid using "interviewed with" when you actually mean "interviewed by". The former emphasizes the interviewee's action, while the latter focuses on the interviewer.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "interviewed with" functions as a verb phrase, indicating the action of participating in an interview. Ludwig's examples show its use across various contexts where individuals meet for the purpose of an interview. It emphasizes the interviewee's engagement in the process.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

33%

Academia

32%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "interviewed with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to describe someone's participation in an interview. As confirmed by Ludwig, it's prevalent across news, scientific, and academic domains, typically carrying a neutral to professional tone. When using this phrase, make sure it accurately reflects the interviewee's action and role. Be mindful of the context to ensure clarity and appropriateness, and consider alternatives like "had an interview at" or "met with for an interview" to add nuance to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

had an interview at

Focuses on the location of the interview rather than the action itself.

met with for an interview

Emphasizes the meeting aspect of the interview process.

underwent an interview with

Emphasizes the experience or process of being interviewed.

participated in an interview with

Highlights active involvement in the interview.

was interviewed by

Shifts focus to the interviewer's role rather than the interviewee's action.

was screened by

Highlights the screening aspect of the interview, often implying a preliminary assessment.

sat for an interview with

Implies a more formal or structured interview setting.

spoke with during the interview

Focuses on the conversation aspect within the interview.

attended an interview at

Focuses on attendance at the interview event.

had a discussion with for a job

Generalizes the interaction to a discussion in a job context.

FAQs

How can I use "interviewed with" in a sentence?

You can use "interviewed with" to describe the act of meeting with someone for an interview, such as "I recently interviewed with the hiring manager for the marketing position."

What are some alternatives to "interviewed with"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "had an interview at", "was interviewed by", or "met with for an interview".

Is it grammatically correct to say "interviewed with"?

Yes, "interviewed with" is grammatically correct when used to indicate that someone participated in an interview process, as confirmed by linguistic analysis.

What's the difference between "interviewed with" and "interviewed by"?

"Interviewed with" focuses on the person being interviewed and their action of interviewing in that context. In contrast, "interviewed by" shifts the focus to the person or entity conducting the interview.