interrupted by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "interrupted by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where one action or event is stopped or disrupted by another action or event. Example: "The meeting was interrupted by a sudden power outage, leaving everyone in the dark."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

He is interrupted by Cpl.

The New York Times

"Gunfight interrupted by spacecraft".

The Guardian - TV & Radio

We are interrupted by a woman staffer.

The New Yorker

The match was twice interrupted by rain.

The New York Times - Sports

This was interrupted by a loud bang.

The New Yorker

His apology was interrupted by a beeping.

The New York Times - Magazine

He is interrupted by Samuel and Tom.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Prayers are not usually interrupted by applause.

The New York Times

Cliches are interrupted by banalities.

The Guardian - Books

He's interrupted by a fan.

The Guardian - Music

But he kept being interrupted by Cody.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Vary your sentence structure by occasionally placing "interrupted by" at the beginning of the sentence for emphasis.

Common error

Avoid ambiguity by ensuring that the subject immediately following "interrupted by" is unequivocally the cause of the interruption.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "interrupted by" functions as a prepositional phrase, commonly used to indicate that an action or event has been stopped or disrupted by another event or action. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is a standard and usable construction in English. Examples from Ludwig show its frequent use across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

30%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "interrupted by" is a grammatically sound and versatile construction used to indicate that an action or event has been stopped or disrupted by another. According to Ludwig AI, it's a correct and usable phrase in written English. Its neutral tone and frequent usage across various contexts, including news, science, and encyclopedias, make it a valuable addition to any writer's toolkit. While alternatives like "disrupted by" or "halted by" exist, understanding the nuances of each can help refine your writing and ensure clarity. By avoiding ambiguity in identifying the interrupter, writers can effectively communicate the dynamic between the interrupted action and the disrupting event.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

disrupted by

Highlights the disturbance caused by the intervening event.

halted by

Focuses on a sudden stop rather than a temporary disruption.

cut short by

Suggests an abrupt termination before completion.

broken up by

Emphasizes the fragmentation of the original action.

disturbed by

Highlights the unsettling nature of the interruption.

suspended by

Implies a temporary cessation of activity.

interfered with by

Suggests meddling or unwanted intrusion.

intervened in by

Indicates that something came between the original action.

obstructed by

Focuses on the hindering effect of the interruption.

checked by

Emphasizes control imposed by the interruption.

FAQs

How can I use "interrupted by" in a sentence?

Use "interrupted by" to show that an action or event was stopped or disrupted by something else. For example, "The concert was interrupted by a sudden rainstorm".

What are some alternatives to saying "interrupted by"?

You can use alternatives like "halted by", "disrupted by", or "cut short by" depending on the specific context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "interrupted by"?

Yes, "interrupted by" is grammatically correct and commonly used in both formal and informal writing to indicate that something has been stopped or broken off by an external factor.

What's the difference between "interrupted by" and "interfered with"?

"Interrupted by" indicates a stoppage or break in an activity, while "interfered with" suggests a hindering or meddling effect. "Interrupted by" is more direct in denoting cessation.