interfered with

USAGE SUMMARY

"interfered with" is an appropriate and correct phrase that can be used in written English.
For example, "The storm interfered with our plans for the weekend."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Reading interfered with breeding.

The New Yorker

interfered with" his theories about sexuality.

The New Yorker

Even Hurricane Sandy interfered with practice time.

The New York Times - Sports

These worries, naturally, interfered with his writing.

The New Yorker

Guacamole is mostly avocado, minimally interfered with.

The New York Times - Food

True enough, this interfered with performance.

The New York Times

Problems again interfered with the race.

Encyclopedia Britannica

But it hardly interfered with our meal.

The New York Times - Travel

These are not to be interfered with".

Encyclopedia Britannica

He interfered with the catch.

The New York Times - Sports

Local fishing was interfered with.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "interfered with", ensure the context clearly identifies what was disrupted and the nature of the interference. Be specific to enhance clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "interfered with" when a stronger term like "prevented" or "stopped" is more accurate. "Interfered with" suggests partial disruption, not complete cessation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "interfered with" primarily functions as a verb phrase taking a prepositional complement. It typically describes an action that disrupts or negatively affects something. Ludwig examples demonstrate its usage across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Academia

15%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Science

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "interfered with" is a common and grammatically correct verb phrase used to describe disruption or obstruction. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is widely applicable across various contexts, particularly in news, academic, and encyclopedic sources. When writing, ensure you clearly identify what was disrupted and use the phrase appropriately to convey the intended meaning of partial disruption rather than complete prevention. Related phrases like "disrupted", "impeded", and "hindered" can be used as alternatives depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

disrupted

Focuses on causing a disturbance or interruption.

impeded

Highlights the act of slowing down or preventing progress.

hindered

Emphasizes making it difficult for something to occur or progress.

obstructed

Indicates blocking or preventing movement or progress.

affected

Highlights the influence or impact on something, often negatively.

discombobulated

Highlights a disturbance to one's composure

tampered with

Suggests unauthorized alteration or manipulation.

intruded on

Emphasizes unwelcome entry or interruption.

meddled in

Suggests interfering in someone else's affairs.

intervened in

Focuses on getting involved to alter a situation.

FAQs

How can I use "interfered with" in a sentence?

Use "interfered with" to describe how something was disrupted or negatively affected. For example, "The heavy rain "interfered with" the outdoor concert."

What are some alternatives to "interfered with"?

You can use alternatives such as "disrupted", "impeded", or "hindered" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "interfered on" instead of "interfered with"?

No, the correct preposition to use with "interfered" in this context is "with". Saying "interfered on" is grammatically incorrect.

What's the difference between ""interfered with"" and "affected"?

"Interfered with" implies a disruption or obstruction, while "affected" simply means influenced, which can be positive, negative, or neutral.