Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
interpretations contributed
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "interpretations contributed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the various interpretations or insights that have been provided by individuals or groups on a particular topic or subject. Example: "The interpretations contributed by the panelists during the discussion added depth to our understanding of the issue."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
18 19 How much these competing interpretations contributed to the variation is unclear.
Science
All authors contributed to the interpretations, contributed to the drafting and revising of this manuscript and have given final approval of the same.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
The inclusion of direct quotes in the presentation of the results allows the reader to read the raw data and the author's interpretations contributing to rigour.
Science
LEE: Conducted the data analysis and interpretation, contributed to the drafting and revision of the article, and approved the final version.
Science
JH: Study Chief Investigator, designed study, contributed to data interpretation, contributed to drafting of paper.
Science
DC: Study Chief Investigator, designed study, contributed to data interpretation, contributed to drafting of paper.
Science
WB: Study Chief Investigator, designed study, contributed to data interpretation, contributed to drafting of paper.
Science
NDY participated in data analysis, interpretation, contributed towards drafting and provided critical review of the manuscript.
Science
AdM led on data collection, analysis, and data interpretation, contributed to writing.
Science
ST Study Chief Investigatorr, designed study, conducted data analysis and interpretation, contributed to drafting of paper.
Science
SS and PB assisted in data-analyzing interpretation, contributed to writing, and provided feedback on drafts.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "interpretations contributed" when you want to show how different perspectives or analyses helped shape a particular outcome or understanding. For instance, "competing interpretations contributed to the variation in results".
Common error
Avoid using "interpretations contributed" without specifying the source. Vague statements like "interpretations contributed to the confusion" lack clarity. Instead, identify the specific group or individual whose interpretations are being referenced.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "interpretations contributed" functions as a verb phrase indicating that different interpretations played a part in influencing or shaping a particular outcome, event, or understanding. As Ludwig AI tells us, the phrase is usable in written English.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "interpretations contributed" is grammatically correct and suitable for academic or scientific writing. As per Ludwig AI, the phrase is usable in written English. It highlights the influence of different viewpoints on a specific outcome, and is typically found in formal contexts, particularly within scientific publications. The phrase is not very common, so consider if interpretations played a role or interpretations influenced might be a more common alternative.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
interpretations played a role
Focuses on the role interpretations have without necessarily implying contribution or influence.
interpretations influenced
Highlights the effect of interpretations on a specific outcome or understanding, differing from a direct contribution.
interpretations shaped
Emphasizes the formative power of interpretations in influencing something, diverging from a collaborative contribution.
interpretations added to
Stresses that interpretations increased the amount or value of something, differing from the concept of direct contribution.
perspectives affected
Focuses on how different viewpoints had an effect, rather than a direct contribution of interpretations.
viewpoints impacted
Highlights the impact of viewpoints, differing from the action of interpretations contributing to a specific outcome.
insights informed
Emphasizes the way in which insights served as a basis for informing something, rather than a simple contribution.
analyses enhanced
Focuses on improvements brought by analytical work, not necessarily contributions from interpretations themselves.
explanations aided
Emphasizes the support provided by different explanations, varying from the concept of contributing interpretations.
readings impacted
Concentrates on readings that had some effect, rather than interpretations actively contributing to a particular outcome.
FAQs
How can I use "interpretations contributed" in a sentence?
You can use "interpretations contributed" to show how different analyses or perspectives helped to shape a particular outcome or understanding. For instance, "The diverse "interpretations contributed to" a richer understanding of the text."
What is a good alternative to "interpretations contributed"?
Alternatives include "interpretations influenced", "interpretations shaped", or "interpretations played a role", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.
Is it better to say "interpretations contributed" or "interpretations were contributed"?
"Interpretations contributed" is generally preferred because it is more direct and active. "Interpretations were contributed" is passive and can sound less clear.
What's the difference between "interpretations contributed" and "interpretations were considered"?
"Interpretations contributed" implies that the interpretations had an impact or effect, whereas "interpretations were considered" simply means that the interpretations were taken into account, without necessarily affecting the outcome.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested