interfered from

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "interfered from" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly as "interfered" should be followed by "with" instead of "from." Example: "He interfered with the project by making unnecessary changes."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

In this review, we focus on various EMT signaling pathways that can be interfered from newly designed targeted therapeutics.

Drug Discovery Today: Disease Mechanisms

The compositional variability is interfered from uncertainties introduced during the analysis subject to the analytical method chosen.

Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports

Marcel Schmelzer seemed to have scored an equaliser but after much deliberation the referee Dr Jochen Drees rightfully chalked off the goal – Lewandowski had interfered from an offside position.

The Guardian - Sport

The above results indicated that there was no ion suppression or enhancement for columbianadin interfered from the rat plasma matrix.

Chemistry Central Journal

In information asymmetric-induced packet losses, link l i,j) is interfered from link l ′(i ′,j ′) if the above mentioned geometric configuration stands true for both scenarios.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Moreover, the inferior and inferoposterior regions were dominated mainly by RCA territories corresponding to the myocardial short axis and vertical long axis; while arteries regions which LAD and LCX dominated were less interfered from "liver-heart artifact".

BioMed Research International

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

Gore was interfering from a distance, changing horses in midstream (removing Laurence H. Tribe from the second Supreme Court argument), suspecting secret plots where the opposition's strategy was open and obvious.

The New York Times - Books

This also helps differentiate between stations interfering from transmission and carrier sense range.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

The proposed method was applied for the determination of LEV in spiked human plasma without interfering from the plasma peak.

Chemistry Central Journal

Two-flow classification of [2] assumes the same transmission and carrier sense range and do not clearly differentiate between links interfering from transmission and carrier sense range.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

This is due to the fact that proposed model can clearly differentiate between links interfering from transmission and carrier sensing range.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "interfered from". The correct phrasing is "interfered with" when describing something being disrupted or obstructed.

Common error

Do not use "interfered from"; always use "interfered with". The preposition "with" correctly indicates that something is being disrupted or negatively affected, whereas "from" is grammatically incorrect in this context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "interfered from" is typically intended to function as a verb phrase with a preposition, aiming to describe how something is disrupted or prevented by an external factor. However, Ludwig AI identifies this usage as incorrect; "interfered" should be followed by "with".

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

43%

News & Media

36%

Encyclopedias

7%

Less common in

Academia

6%

Formal & Business

4%

Reference

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "interfered from" appears in various contexts, particularly scientific and news-related content, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI highlights that the correct form is "interfered with". Therefore, it is best to avoid "interfered from" and instead use the correct prepositional phrase or explore alternative expressions like "prevented from" or "obstructed from" to ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy. When using variations with "interfere", be mindful of the appropriate preposition to maintain correct usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

interfered with

This is the grammatically correct alternative, directly addressing the error.

prevented from

Focuses on the act of stopping someone or something from doing something, implying a proactive measure.

obstructed from

Implies a physical or metaphorical barrier that hinders progress or movement.

impeded from

Suggests a slowing down or hindering of progress, often due to difficulties or obstacles.

hindered from

Similar to 'impeded from', but can also imply a more deliberate act of obstruction.

hampered by

Emphasizes the difficulties or challenges caused by something.

inhibited from

Suggests a restraint or suppression of an action or feeling.

disrupted by

Highlights the disturbance or interruption caused by an external factor.

constrained by

Highlights the limitation or restriction imposed by some factor.

affected by

Indicates an influence or impact, without necessarily implying prevention.

FAQs

Is "interfered from" grammatically correct?

No, "interfered from" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase is "interfered with". Ludwig AI confirms this is a common error.

What is the proper preposition to use after "interfered"?

The proper preposition to use after "interfered" is "with". For example, "The noise "interfered with" my concentration".

What can I say instead of "interfered from"?

Since "interfered from" is incorrect, use alternatives such as "prevented from", "obstructed from", or the grammatically correct ""interfered with"".

How does "interfered with" differ from "prevented from"?

"Interfered with" suggests disruption or obstruction, while "prevented from" implies stopping something from happening altogether. The first focuses on disturbance, the second on prevention.