inhibit progress for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "inhibit progress for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing factors or actions that hinder or slow down advancement in a particular context or situation. Example: "The lack of funding can inhibit progress for the research project, making it difficult to achieve our goals."

✓ Grammatically correct

Unicef

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

These include early marriages, lack of access to education, traditional and religious practices that inhibit progress for children, child neglect, lack of child maintenance by men, land and property grabbing from widows and orphans, property ownership rights, child physical and sexual abuse and other human rights violations.

Unicef

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Those who work to double down on the current dynamic that has inhibited progress for so long are not part of the solution, they're part of the problem.

Yale University

The debate on global warming is burdened with unfortunate misconceptions that inhibit progress in moving forward (see "Planning for a Climate-Changed World").

MIT Technology Review

Each state will be led by a coalition of key public and private sector leaders committed to mobilizing and sustaining political and financial support for the agenda and addressing legislative or regulatory barriers that inhibit progress.

Harvard University

There are other reasons that inhibit progress, which need to be confronted.

India's Financial Markets An Insider's Guide to How the Markets Work

"The economic and regulatory environment has the potential to delay or inhibit progress," he added.

The New York Times

In the lab, misunderstandings and poor communication between intuitive thinkers and sensation-oriented people inhibit progress.

Science Magazine

First we need to break down the organizational silos that so often inhibit progress.

Huffington Post

He continued, "This is, in many ways, what inhibits progress in the West: the need for paper qualifications.

Huffington Post

All the evidence suggests that after patent protection is obtained, it tends to be used as a means for hurting competitors and inhibiting progress.

The Economist

A nearly three-year evaluation of Mr. Daley's program by researchers at the University of Chicago and Loyola University tracked more than 500 homeless people for a year and found a fragmented system that inhibited progress.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "inhibit progress for", ensure that the context clearly identifies what is being hindered and for whom or what the progress is intended. This helps maintain clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

While grammatically correct, "inhibit progress for" can sound somewhat awkward or less polished in formal writing. Consider more concise or elegant alternatives like "hinder advancement" or "impede development" to improve the flow and impact of your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "inhibit progress for" functions as a verb phrase that describes the action of hindering or impeding advancement toward a specific goal or for a particular entity. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Formal & Business

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Science

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "inhibit progress for" is a grammatically sound but relatively uncommon expression used to describe the act of hindering or slowing down advancement towards a goal or for a specific group. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable in written English. While it's understandable and functional, more polished alternatives such as "hinder advancement for" or "impede development for" might be preferred in formal writing. The primary context where this phrase appears is in formal and business related texts, and it's less frequent in other areas like news, science, or academia. Therefore, while correct, consider the context and audience when choosing to use "inhibit progress for", and be mindful of more common and stylistically refined alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

impede advancement for

Replaces "inhibit" with "impede" and "progress" with "advancement", maintaining a similar meaning of hindering forward movement.

hinder development for

Substitutes "inhibit" with "hinder" and "progress" with "development", slightly altering the focus to the process of growth and maturity.

slow down advancement for

Uses the phrasal verb "slow down" instead of "inhibit", making the phrase more descriptive and less formal.

obstruct the advancement of

Replaces "inhibit progress" with "obstruct the advancement", providing a more formal and forceful alternative.

hamper the growth of

Uses "hamper" instead of "inhibit" and focuses on "growth" rather than general progress.

stifle development for

Replaces "inhibit" with "stifle", suggesting a more forceful suppression of development.

retard the advancement of

Uses "retard" to imply a slowing or delaying of advancement.

undermine the process of

Shifts the focus to weakening or destabilizing the process, rather than directly preventing progress.

impair the progression of

Substitutes "inhibit" with "impair", suggesting a weakening or damaging effect on the progression.

block the forward movement of

Uses more literal language to describe the act of preventing forward movement.

FAQs

How can I use "inhibit progress for" in a sentence?

You can use "inhibit progress for" to describe factors that slow down or prevent advancement. For example, "Lack of funding can inhibit progress for the research project".

What are some alternatives to "inhibit progress for"?

Alternatives include "impede advancement for", "hinder development for", or "slow down advancement for", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "inhibit progress for" grammatically correct?

Yes, "inhibit progress for" is grammatically correct, though it's not the most common phrasing. It's generally understood but might sound slightly awkward to some native English speakers.

What's the difference between "inhibit progress for" and "inhibit progress"?

"Inhibit progress" is a more general statement, while "inhibit progress for" specifies who or what the progress is intended for. For example, "High taxes inhibit progress" versus "High taxes inhibit progress for small businesses".