indicated with

USAGE SUMMARY

"indicated with" is a correct and usable phrase in English.
You can use it when you want to make reference to something that has been referenced or alluded to in a certain way. For example, "The timeline for the project was indicated with a series of diagrams and charts."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

She indicated with her head.

The New Yorker

Tumors are indicated with arrows.

EJNMMI Research

Standard deviation indicated with bars.

Chemistry Central Journal

Those are indicated with symbol.

EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing

Beads incorrectly classified are indicated with.

Heritage Science

Microtubules are indicated with a red star.

Biophysics Reports

Landrace accessions are indicated with triangles.

Rice

The averages are indicated with horizontal lines.

Heritage Science

Non-normally distributed data is indicated with ▼.

Sports Medicine - Open

Tumors are indicated with white arrows.

EJNMMI Research

Water flows are indicated with arrows.

Bioresources and Bioprocessing

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "indicated with", ensure that the symbol or method of indication is clear to the reader. Vague references can cause confusion.

Common error

Avoid overly passive constructions. While "indicated with" is often used in the passive voice, consider whether an active voice construction would be clearer and more direct. For example, instead of "The errors are indicated with asterisks", you could write "Asterisks indicate the errors".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "indicated with" functions as a passive construction used to specify how something is being pointed out or identified. Ludwig provides numerous examples showing its usage in scientific and general contexts. Its primary function is to provide clarity and direction to the reader or listener.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

84%

News & Media

10%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "indicated with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to specify how something is being pointed out or identified. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage spans across scientific, news, and formal business contexts, serving the purpose of guiding the audience to interpret elements within a context. While its register can range from formal to neutral, clarity should always be prioritized when using this phrase. Common alternatives include "shown with", "marked with", and "denoted by", each carrying nuanced differences in emphasis. By avoiding overuse of the passive voice and ensuring clear references, writers can effectively employ "indicated with" to enhance the precision and clarity of their communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

shown with

Replaces "indicated" with a more direct verb, emphasizing the visual aspect.

marked with

Focuses on the act of labeling or distinguishing something.

denoted by

Emphasizes the symbolic representation of something.

represented by

Highlights the way something is portrayed or symbolized.

identified by

Stresses the act of recognizing or distinguishing something.

specified by

Highlights that a detail has been explicitly described.

designated by

Focuses on the act of officially assigning a symbol or meaning.

labeled with

Emphasizes the act of attaching a descriptive tag.

distinguished by

Highlights the unique characteristics that set something apart.

signified by

Focuses on the deeper meaning or implication of a symbol.

FAQs

How do I use "indicated with" in a sentence?

"Indicated with" is typically used to show how something is pointed out or identified. For example, "Tumor locations are indicated with white circles."

What are some alternatives to "indicated with"?

You can use alternatives like "shown with", "marked with", or "denoted by depending on the context.

Is it better to use "indicated with" or "indicated by"?

Both are correct, but "indicated with" emphasizes the means of indication, while "indicated by" emphasizes the cause or reason. For example, "The path is indicated with signs" versus "Success is indicated by increased revenue."

What does it mean when something is "indicated with" an asterisk?

When something is "indicated with" an asterisk, it means an asterisk symbol is used to draw attention to it, often to signify a footnote, a special condition, or statistical significance.