Ai Feedback
Exact(7)
All the 4 QFT-IT indeterminate subjects were negative for TST.
Exclusion of indeterminate subjects (2 subjects; 1%) further enhanced the sensitivity to 98.3% (95%CI: 96%–100%).
Of 18 indeterminate subjects, 12 (67%) showed ≤0.1 IU/ml IFN-γ response and 16 (89%) showed <0.25 IU/ml IFN-γ response to PHA (Table 5).
Both the IP-10 indeterminate subjects were negative for TST and 9 of the IP-10 negatives were positive for TST.
The ranges of IFN-γ levels to PHA were 0.5 to 15.23 IU/ml in QFT-G negative subjects and 0 0.39 IU/ml in QFT-G indeterminate subjects.
When we analyzed the levels of IFN-γ in response to PHA, we found that all the culture confirmed QFT-G indeterminate subjects secreted IFN-γ in the range of 0 0.25 IU/ml and in particular most of the subjects showed ≤0.10 IU/ml.
Similar(52)
The predicates of all these true statements correspond to forms really inhering in the relatively indeterminate subject.
Each such predication attributes a form to the underlying, "material," indeterminate subject, and each such subject is in turn a composite of a form and a deeper, underlying material subject.
Here the identity is between a variable, i.e. an indeterminate subject ('he'), and Scott; 'the author of Waverley' has been analysed away, and no longer appears as a constituent of the proposition.
Only one indeterminate subject became positive for QFT-G.
The subject criterion by itself leads to the answer that the substance of x is an entirely indeterminate matter of which x is composed (1029a10).
Related(20)
ambiguous subjects
ongoing subjects
unclassified subjects
uncertain subjects
unknown subjects
unspecified subjects
undetermined subjects
perennial subjects
lifelong subjects
constant subjects
undefined subjects
standing subjects
continuing subjects
indeterminate between-the-wars
indeterminate parts
indeterminate choices
indeterminate results
indeterminate realities
indeterminate interactions
indeterminate lesions
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com