incorrectly included

USAGE SUMMARY

"incorrectly included" is a valid phrase that can be used in written English.
It is typically used to describe a word or phrase that has been mistakenly included in a sentence, causing confusion or altering the intended meaning. Example: The sentence "I went to the store with my brother and sister who were visiting from out of town" is incorrectly included, as it suggests that the brother and sister were visiting from out of town, rather than the narrator. A better way to phrase this sentence would be "While my brother and sister were visiting from out of town, I went to the store."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

An earlier version incorrectly included Michigan on that list.

The Washington Post

The letter H was incorrectly included, leaving his wife's name reading as VIHCTORIA.

The Guardian - Sport

*An earlier version of this sentence incorrectly included the musician Bill Monroe.

The New Yorker

The previously reported $30 million figure incorrectly included dealer advertising spending.

The New York Times

*An earlier version of this sentence incorrectly included the musician Bill Monroe.

The New Yorker

A recipe last Wednesday with the Pairing column for spaghetti alla Norma incorrectly included an ingredient.

The New York Times

Leaf incorrectly included in foliation of volume, making counts for all eleven titles off by one leaf.

Yale University

The company added that "calls receiving intercept messages incorrectly included local calls and long-distance calls from several carriers".

The New York Times

An earlier version of this article incorrectly included one state in a list of those east of the Mississippi River.

The New York Times - Science

Editor's note: The Post's earlier calculated estimates of working-age disability rates for counties incorrectly included some non-disabled children.

The Washington Post

The results indicate that the effect of linear transformation on moment redistribution is neglected or incorrectly included in various design codes.

Engineering Structures

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Pair "incorrectly included" with specific details about the correction or the intended inclusion. This enhances clarity and provides a complete picture of the situation.

Common error

Avoid using "incorrectly included" without specifying what the error is. For example, instead of saying "The data was incorrectly included", specify "The sales figures from last year were incorrectly included in this year's report."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "incorrectly included" functions as an adverbial modifier followed by a past participle, indicating that something was added or listed by mistake. As Ludwig AI specifies, it highlights an error in inclusion. The examples from Ludwig demonstrate its use across various contexts to point out specific errors.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "incorrectly included" is a commonly used phrase for pointing out errors of inclusion across diverse contexts, from academic research to news reporting. Ludwig AI confirms its standard usage, and the examples illustrate its function in correcting mistakes and ensuring accuracy. While the phrase itself is grammatically sound, clarity is paramount; specify what the error is to avoid ambiguity. Consider using synonyms like "erroneously added" or "mistakenly inserted" based on the nuance you aim to convey. By following best practices and avoiding common errors, you can use "incorrectly included" effectively in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

erroneously added

Focuses on the addition itself being mistaken.

mistakenly inserted

Highlights the action of putting something in the wrong place.

wrongly incorporated

Emphasizes the improper integration of something.

inaccurately listed

Specifically refers to errors in lists or enumerations.

falsely attributed

Indicates an incorrect assignment or connection.

improperly comprised

Suggests a flaw in the composition or makeup of something.

unjustifiably comprised

Suggests a component that doesn't have the authority to be there.

deceptively comprised

Suggests that a component was added in a shady or malicious way.

invalidly comprised

Suggests a component that doesn't have the needed conditions or requirements.

invalidly added

Suggests a component that doesn't have the needed conditions or requirements.

FAQs

How can I use "incorrectly included" in a sentence?

You can use "incorrectly included" to describe something that was mistakenly added to a list, document, or group. For example: "The name of the deceased was "incorrectly included" on the invitation list."

What's a good alternative to "incorrectly included"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "erroneously added", "mistakenly inserted", or "wrongly incorporated".

Is it better to say "incorrectly included" or "wrongly included"?

"Incorrectly included" and "wrongly included" are often interchangeable, but "incorrectly included" may sound more formal and precise. Consider the tone and context when choosing between the two.

What's the difference between "incorrectly included" and "inadvertently omitted"?

"Incorrectly included" means something was mistakenly added, while "inadvertently omitted" means something was accidentally left out. They are opposite in meaning.