Ai Feedback
Exact(8)
Recently, Lee and colleagues [13] conducted an event-related fMRI and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) study of spatial WM in schizophrenia to investigate prefrontal activation associated with correct and incorrect memory trials during WM maintenance.
However, the amount of possible responses (here the amount of activated words depending on learning mode) differed: EF-learning introduced two alternative incorrect candidates which intervene in later recognition increasing response conflict compared to EL-learning (please note, however, that during recognition there might be still reduced conflict compared to EF based on incorrect memory traces).
Feedback in the form of the word "Wrong" presented for 500 ms at the center of the screen followed incorrect memory responses.
That is, false recognition is defined by the incorrect memory decision for related lures, as compared to correct memory decisions for the same stimulus category.
Future studies could investigate the result of damage to the angular gyrus: different pieces of information might not be combined, or could result in an incorrect memory during retrieval.
It is possible that using such lists could trigger incorrect memory or confuse participants into thinking that they have used treatments that they have not, because of similarities either in names or in actual treatment technique (e.g. acupuncture and acupressure).
Similar(52)
Schizophrenic patients produced a significant number of confident but incorrect responses ('false memory' errors) during the spatial working memory task.
Taking a wrong turn allows you to backtrack and sear the incorrect road into memory, never to be taken again.
However, subsequent t-tests showed different patterns of group effects for old and new items (Table 1): For hits, there were significant differences between various levels of group conformity; for correct rejections, only the "zero correct" group condition (in which all confederates gave an incorrect response) affected memory performance.
They received visual feedback (500 ms) for incorrect search and memory responses.
Both trial types included in this contrast are perceptually identical, but in one case leading to failures of memory (incorrect trials) and in the other case to successes (correct trials).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com