inconsistent with

USAGE SUMMARY

"inconsistent with" is correct and can be used in written English.
It can be used to indicate that two things are at odds with each other. For example, "The results of the experiment were inconsistent with our hypothesis."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It's also inconsistent with research.

The Washington Post

not inconsistent with this chapter.

Cornell University

That's inconsistent with his judicial obligations".

The New York Times

That's not inconsistent with its being fictional.

The New Yorker

This is not inconsistent with the code.

The Guardian

"Such claims are inconsistent with reality".

The New Yorker

They are inconsistent with American ideals.

The Guardian - Opinion

That's not inconsistent with pricing GHG emissions.

University of California, Berkeley

I know that sounds inconsistent with Joe Biden".

The New Yorker

Both results are inconsistent with expectations.

Research Policy

This kind of behaviour is totally inconsistent with our qualities.

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "inconsistent with" to clearly indicate a discrepancy or contradiction between two or more things. For example, "His actions were "inconsistent with" his words."

Common error

Avoid using "inconsistent with" when the subject lacks a clear reference point. For example, instead of saying "The policy is "inconsistent with", specify what it contradicts: "The policy is "inconsistent with" the company's stated values."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "inconsistent with" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating a lack of agreement or harmony between two elements. As Ludwig AI says, it's a correct way to express that two things do not align. Ludwig examples showcase this phrase in various contexts, highlighting its role in expressing contradictions or discrepancies.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

54%

Science

32%

Academia

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "inconsistent with" is a correct and commonly used prepositional phrase that serves to express a lack of agreement or harmony between two things. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and wide applicability. It is most frequently found in news and media and scientific contexts, making it suitable for formal and professional communication. When using this phrase, ensure that the subjects being compared are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as "at odds with" or "incompatible with" can be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

at odds with

Emphasizes direct opposition or conflict.

incompatible with

Highlights a fundamental inability to coexist or work together.

conflicts with

Focuses on a clash or struggle between two things.

contrary to

Implies a direct contradiction or opposition.

does not align with

Suggests a lack of agreement or correspondence.

at variance with

Indicates a difference or disagreement.

discordant with

Stresses a lack of harmony or agreement.

in opposition to

Highlights a position of direct resistance or antagonism.

deviates from

Focuses on departing from an established norm or standard.

irreconcilable with

Highlights that is not possible to make (ideas, facts, etc.) compatible with each other.

FAQs

How can I use "inconsistent with" in a sentence?

Use "inconsistent with" to show a contradiction or lack of agreement between two things. For example, "His testimony was "inconsistent with" the evidence."

What are some alternatives to "inconsistent with"?

You can use phrases like "at odds with", "incompatible with", or "conflicts with" as alternatives to "inconsistent with", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct, "inconsistent with" or "inconsistent to"?

"Inconsistent with" is the correct and standard usage. "Inconsistent to" is grammatically incorrect.

What's the difference between "inconsistent with" and "different from"?

"Inconsistent with" implies a contradiction or conflict, while "different from" simply indicates a dissimilarity without necessarily implying a conflict. For example, something "different from" something else are two distinct things, while something "inconsistent with" something else implies a contradiction.