inclusion of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "inclusion of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the act of including something as part of a whole or a group. Example: "The inclusion of diverse perspectives in the discussion enriched the overall outcome."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

As the inclusion of Yahoo!

The Economist

The inclusion of tap is no surprise.

The New York Times - Arts

The inclusion of Chile is a surprise.

The Guardian - Opinion

But the inclusion of Cavendish was unexpected.

The Guardian - Sport

The committee recommended the inclusion of the ACCC and Asic.

The Guardian - Opinion

Your inclusion of new buildings resonates with me very directly.

The Guardian

The inclusion of dances for men would have added variety.

The New York Times - Arts

The inclusion of Xerox's China operations could smooth those negotiations.

The New York Times

Does the inclusion of Kim K seem a little unorthodox?

The Guardian

The inclusion of the words "earlier versions" is significant.

The New York Times

This makes the inclusion of Mr. Makoni, 57, intriguing.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "inclusion of", ensure that the noun following "of" clearly identifies what is being included. For example, "the inclusion of diverse perspectives" is more specific and impactful than "the inclusion of things".

Common error

Avoid using "inclusion of" when a simpler word like "adding" or "introducing" would suffice. Overusing the phrase can make your writing sound unnecessarily formal or repetitive.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "inclusion of" primarily functions as a noun phrase. It commonly appears as the subject or object of a sentence, denoting the act of incorporating something into a larger context, as demonstrated by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Science

31%

Formal & Business

12%

Less common in

Academia

6%

Reference

5%

Wiki

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "inclusion of" is a grammatically correct and frequently used noun phrase that signifies the act of incorporating something into a larger whole. As Ludwig AI confirms, its versatility makes it appropriate for various contexts, particularly in news, scientific, and formal business settings. While the phrase is versatile, remember that simpler words might sometimes be better. Always make sure that the context has clear identification for the object to which the phrase refers.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

incorporation of

Changes the root verb to 'incorporate', offering a slightly more formal tone.

addition of

Focuses on the act of adding something, highlighting the increase or expansion.

introduction of

Emphasizes bringing something new into a context or system.

integration of

Suggests a more seamless and blended merging into a whole.

incorporating

Uses the gerund form of the verb, shifting the focus to the action itself.

bringing in

An informal option that suggests adding something from the outside.

the presence of

Highlights the existence or availability of something within a context.

the involvement of

Focuses on active participation and engagement.

the counting of

Emphasizes the act of enumeration or considering items within a set.

the counting in

Highlights the consideration of items as a part of the final number or sum

FAQs

How can I use "inclusion of" in a sentence?

Use "inclusion of" when you want to emphasize the act of incorporating something into a larger whole. For example: "The success of the project depended on the "inclusion of all stakeholders" in the decision-making process."

What are some alternatives to "inclusion of"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "incorporation of", "addition of", or "introduction of". The best choice depends on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "inclusive of" or "inclusion of"?

"Inclusive of" is an adjective phrase that describes something that includes; for example, "The price is inclusive of tax". "Inclusion of" is a noun phrase that refers to the act of including; for example, "The inclusion of tax was clearly stated".

How does "inclusion of" differ from "integration of"?

"Inclusion of" simply means something is part of a whole, while "integration of" suggests a more thorough blending or merging. "The "inclusion of" new members" means they are now part of the group. "The "integration of" new systems" implies they are working seamlessly with existing ones.