included on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "included on" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that something is part of a list, document, or collection. Example: "The names of the participants are included on the final report."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

This included, on one occasion, being described as fascists.

Independent

Choosing which ones are included on the test is another.

The New York Times

Milwaukee was included on the list.

The New York Times

You are included on several.

The New York Times

Service is sometimes included on the bill.

The New York Times - Travel

"I could have easily included on.

The Guardian - Music

It isn't included on the compilation.

The Guardian - Music

This is not included on older policies.

The Guardian - Money

The quantities sent are included on the site.

The New York Times - Health

The results aren't even included on the FA's official website.

The Guardian - Sport

(Drivers for Windows 98 are included on a CD).

The New York Times - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "included on" when you want to emphasize that something is part of a larger list, compilation, or record. Ensure that the context makes it clear what the item is included in.

Common error

Avoid using "included in" when "included on" is more appropriate. "Included in" suggests containment within something, while "included on" implies being part of a list or surface. Example: Use "included on the list" rather than "included in the list".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "included on" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or pronoun, indicating that something is part of a larger entity, such as a list, document, or surface. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is a common and correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "included on" is a grammatically correct and commonly used prepositional phrase that indicates something is part of a larger list, document, or surface. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. It is appropriate for a variety of contexts, ranging from news and media to scientific writing. While alternatives like "featured on" or "listed on" exist, it's important to use the right preposition to avoid confusion; "included on" is best suited for lists and surfaces, whereas "included in" implies containment. The examples analyzed by Ludwig highlight the phrase's versatility and frequency across different sources, making it a valuable tool for clear and effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

listed on

Focuses on the presence of an item in a list.

featured on

Emphasizes prominence or display within a list or collection.

present in

Indicates the existence or availability of something within a set or document.

contained in

Highlights that something is within a physical or digital container.

incorporated into

Suggests a more integrated inclusion, where something becomes part of a whole.

part of

Indicates a general membership or belonging to a larger entity.

specified in

Highlights that something is explicitly named or detailed in a document.

among

Suggests a selection from a larger group. For example, "Included among the candidates".

detailed in

Focuses on comprehensive explanation or description of a thing within a source.

documented in

Emphasizes the presence of records or evidence about a thing within a source.

FAQs

How can I use "included on" in a sentence?

You can use "included on" to indicate that something is part of a list, website, document, or collection. For example, "The song was "featured on" the album" or "His name is "listed on" the website".

What are some alternatives to "included on"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "featured on", "listed on", "part of", or "contained in".

Is there a difference between "included on" and "included in"?

"Included on" usually refers to being part of a list or a surface, like a website page. "Included in" suggests being contained within something, like a book or a group. For instance, "The recipe is "included in" the cookbook", versus "The recipe is "listed on" the website".

Can "included on" be used for physical objects?

Yes, it can be used metaphorically to describe physical objects that have something listed on them. For example, "The warning is "printed on" the label".