listed on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "listed on" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to items that are included in a list or catalog, often indicating where something can be found or referenced. Example: "The book is listed on the library's online catalog for easy access."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

listed on a window sticker.

The New York Times

They were listed on Amer.

The New Yorker

Houses listed on Alibaba usually sell well.

Independent

It was listed on eBay.

The New York Times

Many are listed on the Metropolitan Waterfront Alliance Web site.

The New York Times

BlackRock is also listed on the exchange.

The New York Times

CityFibre listed on Aim in January 2014.

The Guardian - Business

Ones that aren't listed on search engines.

The Guardian

(Check if it is listed on guidestar.org).

The New York Times

Everything is listed on the blackboard.

The New York Times - Travel

It's listed on the stock exchange.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "listed on", ensure the context clearly specifies where the item is listed. For example, "The property is listed on multiple real estate websites."

Common error

Avoid using "listed on" without specifying the platform or directory. Saying "It's listed on the website" without specifying which one lacks clarity. Always provide the specific location or resource.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "listed on" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase that often acts as an adjective modifying a noun. This phrase indicates the location or platform where something is included in a directory or list. Ludwig AI examples show usage in news, science, and general contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Wiki

25%

Science

24%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "listed on" is a widely used prepositional phrase that indicates the presence of an item in a directory, register, or platform. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and frequent usage across various contexts, including news, science, and general-interest websites. While the phrase is generally neutral in tone, its formality can shift based on the source. To maximize clarity, specify the platform or directory when using the phrase. Alternatives like "featured on", "included in", and "available on" can be considered to provide nuance, depending on the specific context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

included in

A more general term for being part of something, without necessarily implying a visible list.

featured on

Emphasizes prominence or showcasing in a particular medium, rather than just simple inclusion.

cataloged in

Specifically refers to items being systematically organized and entered into a catalog.

available on

Focuses on accessibility and where something can be found or obtained.

detailed in

Highlights that you can find details about something in a specific resource

indexed in

Focuses on the presence of an entry in an index or similar finding aid.

recorded in

Highlights the act of documentation or registration, rather than just presence.

specified in

When something is explicitly set out in a document, plan, or procedure.

documented in

Like recorded in, but emphasizes an official written record, often more formal.

present in

Denotes existence or occurrence within a defined context.

FAQs

How can I use "listed on" in a sentence?

You can use "listed on" to indicate where something is included in a list or directory. For example, "The product is listed on the company's website" or "The event is listed on the community calendar".

What alternatives can I use instead of "listed on"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "featured on", "included in", or "available on".

Is it correct to say "listing on" instead of "listed on"?

"Listing on" is grammatically incorrect in most contexts where you'd use "listed on". "Listed on" is the past participle form, indicating the state of being included on a list. "Listing" is the present participle or gerund form, which has different uses.

What is the difference between "listed on" and "found on"?

"Listed on" implies formal inclusion in a directory or list, while "found on" simply means something can be located somewhere. For example, a product is "listed on" a website's catalog, but information might be "found on" a blog post.