included of

USAGE SUMMARY

"included of" is not a correct phrase in written English.
It may be a common mistake or typo for the phrase "inclusive of," which means including or containing. Example: The package price is inclusive of taxes and fees.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Delivery included, of course.

The New York Times

Batteries not included, of course.

The New York Times

Hangover included of course.

The New York Times

Wireless headphones are included, of course.

The New York Times

That included, of course, limousine service.

The New York Times

The hot tub was not included of course.

The Guardian - Opinion

Its parody of a sitcom included, of course, plenty of robotically hysterical canned laughter.

The New Yorker

Heat and hot water included, of course, and we'll need first, last, and deposit once your application is approved.

The New Yorker

That's not what Arsenal fans want to hear and some have accused Barcelona players, you included, of stirring trouble.

The Guardian - Sport

It would have a footprint, or total width when adjacent planted areas are included, of 75 feet.

The New York Times

Which included, of course, the show that really put ITV2 on the map - Secret Diary of a Call Girl.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "included of" in your writing. Instead, opt for grammatically correct alternatives like "inclusive of", "comprising", or "consisting of" to ensure clarity and professionalism.

Common error

A common mistake is using "of" after "included". Remember that "included" is often followed by a direct object or used with prepositions like "in" or "among". Using "inclusive of" or rephrasing the sentence can prevent this error.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "included of" is generally intended to function as a prepositional phrase, aiming to express that something is part of a larger whole. However, according to Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically incorrect. The intended function is similar to phrases like "inclusive of" or "comprising", but the incorrect usage undermines its effectiveness.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "included of" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment. While the intention is to convey that something is part of a larger whole, better alternatives such as "inclusive of", "comprising", or "consisting of" are recommended to ensure clarity and correctness. Although some examples exist, they do not justify the use of this non-standard phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

inclusive of

This is a grammatically correct alternative that clearly indicates that something is included as part of a whole.

comprising

This term indicates that something is made up of specific parts or elements.

consisting of

Similar to "comprising", this denotes the components that make up a whole.

composed of

This phrase suggests that something is formed from certain elements.

containing

This indicates that something holds or includes specific items or elements.

encompassing

This term implies that something includes a wide range of elements or aspects.

incorporating

This suggests that something integrates or includes certain features or aspects.

embracing

This indicates that something includes or adopts certain elements or ideas.

made up of

A more informal way to say that something is formed from specific parts.

featuring

This highlights that something includes particular elements or characteristics.

FAQs

What are some correct alternatives to "included of"?

Instead of "included of", you can use alternatives like "inclusive of", "comprising", or "consisting of", depending on the context.

Is "included of" grammatically correct?

No, "included of" is not grammatically correct. The correct phrasing would be "inclusive of" or other similar alternatives.

How can I use "inclusive of" in a sentence?

You can use "inclusive of" to indicate that something is included within a larger whole. For example, "The price is inclusive of all taxes and fees."

What is the difference between "included of" and ""consisting of""?

"Included of" is grammatically incorrect. "Consisting of" is a correct phrase used to describe what something is made up of. For example, "The team consists of five members".