Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

included for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"included for" can be a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that something has been added or incorporated into something else for a specific purpose or reason. It is often used to show that the added element is necessary or helpful to the overall meaning or function of the sentence. Example: The list of required materials for the project included for a detailed description of the assignment, making it easier for students to understand the expectations.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

An exemption is included for churches.

News & Media

The New York Times

A USB cable is included for charging.

News & Media

The New York Times

One is included for free.

None is included for guests.

Their suggestions included, for example, "Dipso.

News & Media

The Guardian

Some Italian artworks have been included for comparative purposes.

Furnishings can be included for an additional sum.

Often, communities have been included for electoral gain.

An exception was included for situations requiring quick action.

News & Media

The New York Times

Admission is $15; an optional lunch is included for $45.

News & Media

The New York Times

However, living American chefs are included for the first time.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "included for", ensure the reason for inclusion is clear and directly related to the main subject. This enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "included for" without specifying the purpose. For instance, instead of saying 'Data was included for', specify 'Data was included for comparison purposes' to give context.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "included for" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a verb or noun phrase to indicate the reason or purpose for something being included. As noted by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and shows that something has been added or incorporated into something else for a specific purpose.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

38%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Social Media

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "included for" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to explain the reason or purpose behind the inclusion of something. According to Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and widely used across various domains, particularly in science and news media. Its primary function is to clarify why an element is present in a larger context. When using "included for", it's important to specify the purpose clearly to avoid ambiguity, such as stating 'Data was included for comparison purposes'. Alternatives like "added for", "provided for", and "incorporated for" can be used depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

FAQs

How can I use "included for" in a sentence?

Use "included for" to indicate that something has been added or incorporated for a specific reason or purpose. For example, "An exception was "included for" situations requiring quick action."

What are some alternatives to "included for"?

Alternatives to "included for" include phrases like "added for", "provided for", or "incorporated for", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to use "included for"?

Yes, "included for" is grammatically correct and commonly used to indicate that something is part of a larger whole or is present for a particular reason. Ludwig AI confirms this correctness.

What's the difference between "included for" and "used for"?

"Included for" suggests that something is part of a collection or set, while "used for" indicates that something is being employed for a specific purpose. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize belonging or function.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: