included by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "included by" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that something is a part of a larger whole or group. Here is an example sentence: Lana's essay was well-written and thorough, but there were a few points that were not included by her classmates in their own papers.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

In group photos, he looks like a wine waiter included by mistake.

The Guardian

Dr. Purves said that Dr. Hamburger should have been included by the Nobel committee.

The New York Times

The crosswords are now starting to be included by stages in this process.

The Guardian

For a moment he wondered if his bank statements had been included by mistake.

The Guardian

(c) Plagioclase included by olivine.

Earth, Planets and Space

Transients can be included by modal analysis.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Turns out there won't be one included by default.

TechCrunch

Heat transfers are included by means of an heterogeneous approach.

Chemical Engineering Science

These particles can be included by two methods, viz.

Electrochimica Acta

The reaction is included by spark plasma sintering.

Carbon

Depth was included by relating it to overburden pressure.

Soil and Tillage Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "included by", ensure the sentence clearly identifies both the included element and the entity or method responsible for the inclusion. This enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "included by" when an active voice construction would be clearer and more direct. For example, instead of "The error was included by John", use "John included the error".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "included by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something has been incorporated or encompassed by a particular agent or method. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is a correct and acceptable usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

68%

News & Media

23%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "included by" is a grammatically sound passive construction used to specify how something has been incorporated into a larger system or process. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and frequently appears in academic, scientific, and news contexts. While the phrase is common, careful consideration should be given to whether an active voice construction would provide greater clarity. Always ensure the sentence clearly identifies the included element and the method or entity responsible for the inclusion. When looking for alternative phrasing, consider terms like "comprised within" or "integrated into" depending on the specific nuances you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

comprised within

Focuses on being contained within a larger group or structure.

encompassed within

Implies a broader scope of inclusion, suggesting complete coverage.

covered under

Suggests inclusion within a specific set of rules, regulations, or guidelines.

integrated into

Highlights the process of combining elements to form a cohesive whole.

implemented through

Emphasizes the mechanism used to achieve a specific result or inclusion.

accounted for by

Emphasizes the reason or explanation for something's inclusion.

effected by

Focuses on the means or method through which something is included or caused.

attributed to

Connects something as a consequence or result of a specific cause.

brought about by

Highlights the action that led to a particular outcome or inclusion.

caused by

Directly indicates a causal relationship, specifying the agent of causation.

FAQs

How can I use "included by" in a sentence?

Use "included by" to indicate that something is part of a larger set or process. For instance, "The feature set is "included by" default in the installation package".

What are some alternatives to "included by"?

You can use phrases like "comprised of", "contains", or "is part of" depending on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "included by" or "included within"?

"Included by" generally indicates the agent or method of inclusion, while "included within" specifies a containing entity. Choose the phrase that best reflects the relationship you're describing.

How does the meaning of "included by" differ from "caused by"?

"Included by" indicates that something is a component or part of something else. "Caused by", on the other hand, indicates a cause-and-effect relationship. They are not interchangeable; use "caused by" when you want to show that one thing led to another.