include risks for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "include risks for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing potential dangers or uncertainties associated with a particular action, decision, or situation. Example: "The new policy may include risks for employee safety that need to be addressed before implementation."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

"Our research has already shown a link between childhood bullying and risk of mental health disorders in children, adolescents and adults, but this study is the first to widen the spectrum of adverse outcomes to include risks for cardiovascular disease at mid-life.

The Guardian

Other risks that may be increased by stress-induced damage include risks for cancer, infection, and cognitive decline.

SEP

These include risks for contracting HIV, unwanted pregnancy, psychological distress, and many more".

Unicef

Excess risk equations based on CPS I data extend these risk equations to include risks for former and never smokers [ 9].

Cancer Causes and Control

The content should include risks for the couple (eg, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, waiting time, psychosocial stress and limited pregnancy success rate), as well as to the embryo, fetus and child to be born.

European Journal of Human Genetics

In addition, our estimates do not include risks for adult-onset or other conditions, such as obesity, that alone would likely not lead to an individual to be referred for clinical microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization testing.

Genetics in Medicine

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

When you consider the risks undertaken by US military personnel, do you include risk for disease?

Emerging Infectious Diseases

Significant drawbacks with closed suction systems include risk for producing high negative pressures and reduced efficacy in removing thick secretions from the airways [ 2, 11, 12].

Critical Care

Some of the included risks for harms appear rather remote such as "synthesizing DNA strings and placing them at a crime scene" by malicious users.

Life Sciences, Society and Policy

As such, a complete patient history is needed to determine the outcome risks for all wounds, including risks for and type of potential contamination, activity at time of injury, functional changes, and any comorbid illnesses that may prevent or decrease normal healing.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

The problem with doing C-sections when they're not medically necessary is that they're still a major abdominal surgery and every surgery includes risks for infection, hemorrhage, scarring, adhesions and complications from anesthesia.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the context of your writing. If you're aiming for a more formal tone, opt for synonyms like "entail risks" or "present potential dangers".

Common error

Avoid using "include risks for" without specifying the nature of the risks. Vague statements lack impact and leave the reader uncertain about the true dangers involved. For example, instead of saying "The project includes risks for the company", specify "The project includes risks for the company's reputation and financial stability".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "include risks for" functions as a connector, linking an action or situation to its potential negative consequences. As per Ludwig, it is considered correct and usable. The phrase introduces the idea that certain actions or situations bring with them specific dangers or downsides.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

25%

Formal & Business

25%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "include risks for" is a grammatically correct and understandable way to introduce potential dangers or uncertainties. As Ludwig AI shows, it frequently appears in scientific, news, and formal business contexts. When writing with this phrase, always remember to clearly specify what the risks are and who or what is affected. While "include risks for" is acceptable in many situations, consider the specific context and register to determine if a more formal or nuanced alternative might be a better fit. Remember to avoid overgeneralizing the risks to make your writing impactful.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

carry potential hazards

This alternative uses synonyms for both "include" and "risks," focusing on the potential dangers.

entail possible dangers

This alternative uses synonyms that emphasize the consequence aspect of the risks involved.

present potential downsides

This phrase emphasizes the negative aspects or disadvantages that might occur.

involve inherent hazards

This alternative highlights that the risks are a natural or inseparable part of the situation.

pose possible threats

This option focuses on the potential for harm or danger that the risks could create.

raise concerns about dangers

This highlights that the existence of risks is generating worry or unease.

come with potential pitfalls

This is a more idiomatic way of referring to risks, suggesting hidden or unexpected problems.

have associated perils

This version highlights the dangers that are connected to the matter in question.

open the door to possible harms

This alternative suggests that by doing something, you are exposing yourself to bad consequences.

bear latent vulnerabilities

This focuses on the presence of weaknesses that could be exploited or lead to harm.

FAQs

How can I use "include risks for" in a sentence?

You can use "include risks for" to introduce potential dangers or uncertainties associated with a particular action, decision, or situation. For instance, "The treatment may "include risks for" side effects".

What are some alternatives to "include risks for"?

Alternatives to "include risks for" are "pose risks to", "carry risks for", or "entail potential hazards". Each of these phrases can be used depending on the context and the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "includes risk of" or "include risks for"?

While both phrases are grammatically correct, "include risks for" is used to indicate that there are several risks associated with something. "Includes risk of" is used to describe specific risk such as “The surgery includes risk of infection.

How does the formality of "include risks for" compare to its alternatives?

"Include risks for" is generally suitable for neutral to formal contexts. If a more formal tone is required, consider alternatives like "entail potential hazards". If you're writing in a very casual style, "come with possible pitfalls" might be suitable.