Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

include for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "include for" is not correct and it is not used in written English.
To use a phrase such as this, you would need to use "include". For example, "We need to include more vegetables in our diets for better health."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Key findings include: 1.

News & Media

The New York Times

His books include "13 Bankers".

News & Media

The New York Times

Some sets include 20 flowers.

They include: 1.

Benefits include 10 weeks' annual paid vacation.

The case grew to include 41 buyers.

News & Media

The New York Times

These include 4 local members of Congress.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The S.P.'s election promises include: 1.

News & Media

The New York Times

Topics include: 1.

News & Media

Forbes

The rankings include 226 newcomers.

News & Media

Forbes

Those on board include 22 Russian crew.

News & Media

BBC
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "include" directly followed by the item(s) you are adding. For example, "The report should include data from the last quarter."

Common error

Avoid adding "for" after "include". It's grammatically incorrect and unnecessary. Instead of saying "include for", simply use "include".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

60%

Authority and reliability

1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "include for" is grammatically incorrect. The correct verb to use is simply "include", which functions as a transitive verb requiring a direct object. The incorrect addition of "for" after "include" disrupts this structure.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "include for" is grammatically incorrect and not recognized as proper English. As Ludwig AI confirms, the standard usage is simply "include". Therefore, it's crucial to avoid using "include for" in your writing. Instead, opt for the correct verb "include", or explore alternative phrases like "incorporate", "add", or "contain" to effectively convey your intended meaning. Remember to always prioritize grammatical accuracy in your writing.

FAQs

How to correctly use "include" in a sentence?

Use "include" followed by the items you want to add or encompass. For example, "The package will "include" batteries and instructions".

Is "include for" grammatically correct?

No, "include for" is not grammatically correct. The correct usage is simply "include".

What prepositions can follow the word "include"?

The word "include" is typically not followed by a preposition. You can say "This "includes" X, Y, and Z" or "This is "included in" the list" but never "include for".

What can I say instead of "include for"?

Since "include for" is incorrect, use alternatives like "include", "incorporate", or "add", depending on the context.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

60%

Authority and reliability

1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: