Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

in two generations

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "in two generations" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to a time span of approximately 40 to 50 years, typically in discussions about changes, developments, or predictions over that period. Example: "The technology we use today will likely be completely obsolete in two generations."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

However, modern homozygous lines are generally created in two generations using stocks called haploid inducers (Prigge et al. 2012).

Science

Genetics

In general, behavioural risk factors in two generations of non-Western migrants in the Netherlands seem to converge towards the prevalence rates in the Dutch population.

In two generations, they learned to walk the high wire.

News & Media

The New York Times

It is striking how much has changed in two generations.

It's literally famine to gluttony in two generations".

News & Media

The New Yorker

The state is changing shape in two generations.

News & Media

The Economist

I saw a culture with thousands of years of tradition behind it vanquished in two generations.

In two generations, most of their grandchildren won't even be Jews.

Today, Sweden has done a Japan, undertaking an industrial revolution in two generations.

News & Media

The Guardian

It described the bill as "the most important change to social care in two generations".

News & Media

The Guardian

"In two generations, six of us have already been afflicted with it.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "in two generations", consider the specific context and whether a more precise timeframe (e.g., "within 50 years") would be more appropriate for clarity.

Common error

Avoid assuming a fixed length for a generation; it varies based on social and cultural factors. While roughly equivalent to 40-50 years, specify the timeframe if precision is needed.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in two generations" functions primarily as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb or clause to specify a timeframe. As shown by Ludwig, it indicates when a particular action, change, or state is expected to occur.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

53%

Science

42%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "in two generations" serves as a common and grammatically correct adverbial phrase indicating a timeframe of roughly 40-50 years. Ludwig AI confirms its usability across various contexts, particularly in news and scientific discussions. While generally neutral in register, it's important to consider the context and potentially specify a more precise timeframe for clarity. Alternatives such as "within two generations" or "over two generations" can offer slightly different nuances.

FAQs

How can I use "in two generations" in a sentence?

Use "in two generations" to indicate a timeframe of roughly 40 to 50 years, often when discussing changes or predictions. For example, "The effects of climate change will be significantly more pronounced "in two generations"".

What is a good alternative to the phrase "in two generations"?

Alternatives include phrases like "within two generations", "over two generations", or "in the span of two generations", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "in two generations" or "within two generations"?

Both "in two generations" and "within two generations" are correct, but the latter emphasizes that the change will occur before or at the end of that period, while "in two generations" is a more general statement about the timeframe.

Does "in two generations" have a fixed number of years?

While "in two generations" generally refers to approximately 40-50 years, the length of a generation can vary. For precise communication, consider specifying a number of years instead.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: