in three subsequent years

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "in three subsequent years" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to a period of three years that follow a specific point in time, often in a chronological context. Example: "The company saw significant growth in revenue in three subsequent years after the new product launch."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Data were collected before treatment and in three subsequent years, at two spatial scales: plot (1000 m2) and quadrat (1 m2).

Forest Ecology and Management

We sampled the mineral soils of 9 mull and 11 moder/mor sites at 0 50 cm depth and took foliar samples of beech trees in three subsequent years.

Geoderma

Note that egg mass, egg number and relative clutch mass were measured in two successive years and body mass in three subsequent years.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

We sampled during and after OSR flowering, in two subsequent years, yielding app.

Biological Conservation

Two blazes could have nearly identical characteristics in two subsequent years and act quite differently because of the weather patterns leading up to them.

The New York Times

In eight years as a graduate student at U.B.C., Kiehl was able to scan only about fifty inmates, and in seven subsequent years as an associate professor at Yale University he scanned about two hundred former inmates, but only a few were high scorers on the PCL.

The New Yorker

Persistence of utilization, as measured by whether an enrollee had five or more visits in two subsequent years, was stable.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

The salmon found throughout the hearth is a food source available only in the summer, which indicates that the burials and the cremation likely occurred during the same season or in two subsequent years.

Science Magazine

Adult males disperse much shorter distances than juveniles (median dispersal distance between centres of territory sites occupied in two subsequent years of males shifting territory site: 384, 10/90% quantile = 163/1535 m, N = 62; based on males originating from the 8 km2 area; t-test, log-transformed distances: t = −9.48, DF = 259, P<0.0001).

Plosone

Among differentially expressed genes some were validated as markers in two subsequent years and in three different genotypes.

BMC Plant Biology

The reliability of these molecular markers was tested in two subsequent years and a further functional validation was carried out in three different genotypes.

BMC Plant Biology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "in three subsequent years" when you want to clearly specify a three-year period following a particular event or starting point. This phrase is suitable for formal writing where precision is important.

Common error

Avoid using "in three subsequent years" when you mean "in three consecutive years". "Subsequent" refers to following in time or order, while "consecutive" means following continuously. If the years are unbroken, "consecutive" is more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in three subsequent years" functions as an adverbial phrase of time, modifying a verb or clause by specifying when an action or event takes place. Ludwig AI confirms its appropriate usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "in three subsequent years" is a grammatically sound and understandable phrase, though not as common as alternatives like "over the next three years". Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is best suited for formal or scientific writing where clarity and precision are essential. Remember that "subsequent" implies following in time, but not necessarily immediately, differing from "consecutive". It is frequently used in Science and News & Media contexts to denote specific timeframes, and care should be taken to avoid confusion with similar-sounding phrases.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in the following three years

This alternative is very similar, replacing 'subsequent' with 'following', which has a slightly less formal tone.

over the next three years

This alternative uses a more common and straightforward construction, focusing on the future from a reference point.

the three years succeeding that

Uses 'succeeding' to emphasize the chronological order, offering a slightly more formal tone than 'following'.

for the three years thereafter

This shifts the focus to a duration after an event, adding a slight emphasis on the completed initial event.

during the three years after that

This alternative highlights a specific period of three years, placing emphasis on the temporal aspect.

three years from then

Focuses on a period three years after a specific past event.

three years hence

A more concise, albeit less common, way of expressing a period three years from now.

in the subsequent 36 months

Replaces 'years' with the equivalent 'months', providing a more precise timeframe.

three years down the line

This is an informal way of expressing a period three years into the future.

for a triennium thereafter

This uses the less common term 'triennium' to denote a three-year period, creating a more formal tone.

FAQs

How can I use "in three subsequent years" in a sentence?

You can use "in three subsequent years" to describe a period following a specific event or time. For example, "The company saw significant growth "in three subsequent years" after implementing the new strategy."

What phrases are similar to "in three subsequent years"?

Alternatives include "over the next three years", "in the following three years", or "for the three years thereafter".

Is it more appropriate to say "in three subsequent years" or "for three subsequent years"?

Both are grammatically correct, but "in three subsequent years" is more commonly used to specify a period within which something occurred, while "for three subsequent years" emphasizes the duration of something.

What's the difference between "subsequent" and "consecutive" when referring to years?

"Subsequent" means following in time or order, while "consecutive" means following continuously without interruption. Therefore, "three consecutive years" implies an unbroken sequence, whereas "three subsequent years" simply means three years that follow a specific point in time but not necessarily in direct succession.