in three dimensions

USAGE SUMMARY

'in three dimensions' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe something that exists or is expressed in three dimensions, such as a three-dimensional shape or object. For example, "The sculpture was exquisitely carved in three dimensions."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It comes alive in three dimensions.

Independent

Symmetry in three dimensions, above.

The New York Times

1. Negotiate in Three Dimensions.

Harvard University

Consider the spaces made in three dimensions.

The Guardian

The Goya effect, in three dimensions.

The New York Times - Books

Mr. Evans, in three dimensions, is similar.

The New York Times

The boundary was periodic in three dimensions.

Nature

In three dimensions, the situation is different.

The Guardian

An Eden in three dimensions, that is.

The New York Times

Constrained Delaunay triangulations in three dimensions.

University of California, Berkeley

And I'll take vectors in three dimensions.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing the quality of two representations (2D vs. 3D), use "in three dimensions" as an intensifier of the latter.

Common error

Avoid using "in three dimensions" when you actually mean a perspective or viewpoint. Dimensions refer to measurable spatial extents, not angles of observation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in three dimensions" primarily functions as an adverbial phrase, modifying verbs or adjectives to specify the spatial characteristic or representation of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound and widely accepted.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

30%

Science

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "in three dimensions" functions as an adverbial phrase denoting spatial characteristics. Grammatically correct and commonly used, it finds application across diverse contexts, including news, academia, and science. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is versatile and widely accepted. When writing, focus on using it to emphasize spatial characteristics and representation of something. Be mindful that using simpler alternatives like "in 3D" can be more appropriate in informal context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in 3D

Shorter, more common abbreviation, particularly in contexts like movies and technology.

in a 3-dimensional space

More explicit about the spatial environment.

three-dimensional

Adjectival form, often used to describe objects or spaces.

in a spatial context

More abstract and emphasizes the spatial aspect.

with depth and height

Breaks down the three dimensions into components, emphasizing physical attributes.

having length, width and height

Defines the three dimensions precisely.

spatially

Adverbial form, focusing on spatial arrangement.

in full form

Implies a complete representation, including all dimensions.

in its entirety

Emphasizes completeness and wholeness, including spatial dimensions.

through a triaxial perspective

Focuses on the representation method and viewing angle.

FAQs

How can I use "in three dimensions" in a sentence?

You can use "in three dimensions" to describe objects, spaces, or representations that have length, width, and height. For example, "The sculptor created the statue "in three dimensions"".

What's a simpler alternative to "in three dimensions"?

A simpler alternative is "in 3D", especially when referring to movies or technology. However, "in three dimensions" is more appropriate in formal contexts.

Is it correct to say "three-dimensional" instead of "in three dimensions"?

Yes, "three-dimensional" is an adjective that describes something having three dimensions, while "in three dimensions" is a prepositional phrase that specifies the spatial context or representation.

When should I use "in three dimensions" versus other spatial descriptions?

Use "in three dimensions" when you want to explicitly emphasize the presence and importance of depth in addition to height and width. Other options include "in a spatial context" or "with depth and height".