in the same category as

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "in the same category as" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a similarity between things or people, usually by placing them both in a larger group or category. For example, you could say: "We consider dogs and cats to be in the same category as pets."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He's in the same category as Patrick Moore.

The Guardian - Music

The move puts airlines in the same category as tobacco companies, pornographers and arms dealers.

The New York Times - Magazine

"Pasta's getting lumped in the same category as Krispy Kreme," she said.

The New York Times - Food

I would put all those people in the same category as just negative-thinking people".

The New York Times

They put it in the same category as fun or distraction.

The Guardian - Books

They want to put every athlete in the same category as every other athlete.

The New Yorker

But Zaltzman's performance isn't in the same category as those great, tub-thumping names.

The Guardian

Without blinking, they put Tony Romo in the same category as Tom Brady and Peyton Manning.

The New York Times

Nor were terrorists in the same category as a "lunatic assassins".

The Guardian

Torture is in the same category as the bombing of populated places from the air.

The Guardian - Opinion

One is tempted to include Ian McKellen in the same category as Jones.

The Guardian - Film

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "in the same category as" to clearly group items or concepts that share fundamental characteristics, making your comparisons more understandable.

Common error

Avoid placing items in the same category if their connection is superficial. This can weaken your argument and confuse the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in the same category as" functions as a prepositional phrase used to establish a relationship of similarity or equivalence between two or more entities. As confirmed by Ludwig, it correctly places items within a shared classification.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Formal & Business

15%

Science

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "in the same category as" is a versatile prepositional phrase used for classifying and comparing items or concepts. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage. As demonstrated by Ludwig's examples, this phrase appears most frequently in news and media sources. To effectively use this phrase, ensure that the items being compared share significant characteristics, and avoid overusing broad categories that weaken your arguments. Alternatives such as "similar to" or "comparable to" can offer nuanced ways to express similarity, but the core function of grouping items remains consistent.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in the same class as

Highlights identical class.

of a similar type to

Emphasizes shared characteristics.

comparable to

Focuses on similarity for comparison.

analogous to

Implies a more structural or functional similarity.

akin to

Suggests a resemblance or affinity.

on par with

Highlights equivalence in quality or status.

equivalent to

Indicates equality in value or effect.

corresponding to

Implies a direct relationship or match.

indistinguishable from

Suggests a lack of noticeable difference.

bears comparison with

Highlights shared characteristics worthy of exploration.

FAQs

How can I use "in the same category as" in a sentence?

Use "in the same category as" to group similar items or concepts. For instance, "Apples and oranges are "in the same category as" fruits".

What phrases can I use instead of "in the same category as"?

You can use phrases like "similar to", "comparable to", or "akin to" to express a similar relationship.

Is it correct to say "in the same category with" instead of "in the same category as"?

While "in the same category with" might be understood, "in the same category as" is the more standard and grammatically preferred construction.

What's the difference between "in the same category as" and "related to"?

"In the same category as" implies a direct similarity or shared classification, while "related to" suggests a broader association that may not involve direct equivalence.