in teams of two

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "in teams of two" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
This phrase is usually used when describing a situation in which people are working in pairs. For example: "The students were organized into groups of five, with each group working in teams of two."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

24 are associate editors working in teams of two.

Cornell University

Interrogators typically work in teams of two or three.

The New York Times

The two-dozen chef contestants work in teams of two.

The Washington Post

You may work on the various modules in teams of two or three.

University of California, Berkeley

Projects 1 through 5 can be completed alone or in teams of two.

University of California, Berkeley

Entrants must sign up in teams of two, for safety reasons.

The Guardian - Travel

Runners may compete as individuals or in teams of two to four people.

The New York Times - Arts

96 competitors in teams of two, played on wet London sand.

The Guardian - Sport

The company has 16 technicians, who work in teams of two or more.

The New York Times

She has 35 employees who clean three or four homes a day in teams of two.

The Washington Post

Students taking the course work in teams of two, coming from art and computer sciences study programs.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the context. While "in teams of two" is versatile, "in pairs" might be more appropriate for informal settings, while "bilaterally" could suit formal or technical discussions.

Common error

Avoid using "in teams of two" in very casual conversations. Simpler alternatives like "in pairs" or just mentioning working "together" might sound more natural.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in teams of two" primarily functions as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb by describing how an action is performed. Ludwig's examples show it specifying the manner of working, competing, or operating.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

33%

News & Media

41%

Science

21%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "in teams of two" is a grammatically correct and widely used expression to describe activities performed by pairs. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it adheres to standard English grammar. Its frequency across diverse sources, including academia, news media, and scientific publications, demonstrates its versatility. While suitable for both neutral and formal registers, alternatives like "in pairs" might be preferred in more casual settings. Keep in mind the best practices and common errors to ensure effective and appropriate usage in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in pairs

More concise alternative, omitting "teams of", focusing directly on the pairing.

in groups of two

Alternative using "groups" instead of "teams", suitable for less formal contexts.

in tandem

Highlights coordinated effort and working together closely.

working bilaterally

Emphasizes collaboration between two entities, often used in formal settings.

as a duo

Emphasizes the combination of two individuals forming a unit.

in dyads

A more formal and less common term for pairs, often used in academic or research contexts.

in collaboration

Focuses on the cooperative aspect of working together.

two by two

Suggests a sequential or orderly pairing, sometimes with a religious connotation.

in partnerships

Highlights the formal or structured nature of the pairing.

in couplets

Rare and more poetic alternative suggesting a connected or rhyming pair.

FAQs

How can I use "in teams of two" in a sentence?

You can use "in teams of two" to describe collaborative activities. For example, "The students worked "in teams of two" to complete the project".

What's the difference between "in teams of two" and "in pairs"?

While both phrases indicate working in groups of two, "in teams of two" often implies a more structured or organized setting, whereas "in pairs" is more general. Consider also the nuance: "in pairs" suggests two individual entities, whereas "in teams of two" can suggest a joint entity made of 2 people.

What are some alternatives to "in teams of two"?

Alternatives include "in pairs", "working together", or "collaborating", depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "in teams of two"?

Yes, "in teams of two" is grammatically correct and commonly used. According to Ludwig AI, it follows standard English grammar rules.