in subsequent studies

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "in subsequent studies" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate that the studies or research mentioned happened after the main study or research that you are discussing. For example: "This study found strong evidence of a correlation between job satisfaction and productivity in employees. In subsequent studies, it was found that organizations with higher levels of job satisfaction often saw greater profits."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Subsequently, cells were treated with α-solanine up to 24 h in subsequent studies on autophagy.

Cell Death and Disease

When their conclusions were tested in subsequent studies, they have been correct just 60percentt of the time.

The New York Times - Health

The effect of birth order that Das Gupta discovered has now been confirmed in subsequent studies of missing girls.

The New York Times - Magazine

In subsequent studies, Dr. McGuire examined the stages of changing somebody's mind and pointed out that persuasion depends on both exposure to and acceptance of a given message.

The New York Times

In subsequent studies, says Schwartz, the Yale team has found that the W.I.C. reforms "really make a difference in what people purchase".

The New Yorker

Comments: Good results never evaluated in subsequent studies.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

This topic will be investigated in subsequent studies.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

These properties can be evaluated in subsequent studies.

Results in Physics

In subsequent studies, it would be beneficial to address student satisfaction levels as well.

Smart Learning Environments

This dissonance first noticed by Alvin Toffler [33] was confirmed in subsequent studies [9, 25].

European Journal of Futures Research

The significance of this is unclear and has not been confirmed in subsequent studies.

Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "in subsequent studies", ensure that the chronological relationship between the initial study and the following studies is clear to the reader.

Common error

Avoid vague references. Be explicit about which studies you are referring to when using "in subsequent studies". Provide citations or specific details.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in subsequent studies" functions as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb or clause by indicating the timing or sequence of research. As noted by Ludwig, the phrase is commonly used to introduce findings or analyses that followed an initial study, providing additional context or validation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

77%

News & Media

21%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "in subsequent studies" is a common and grammatically correct adverbial phrase used to indicate that research or findings followed an initial study. According to Ludwig, the phrase is useful for providing temporal context and connecting related research. It's particularly prevalent in scientific and news-related contexts. While similar phrases like "in later research" or "in follow-up investigations" exist, they each offer slightly different nuances. When using "in subsequent studies", ensure clarity by explicitly referencing the studies in question and maintaining a formal tone. This ensures effective communication in academic, scientific, and professional settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

In later research

Substitutes "studies" with "research" and "subsequent" with "later", focusing on the temporal aspect.

In follow-up investigations

Replaces "studies" with "investigations" and uses "follow-up" to indicate a continuation of the original work.

Subsequent investigations revealed

Emphasizes the revealing nature of the following investigations, altering the sentence structure.

Further studies indicated

Uses "further" to suggest additional studies and highlights their indicative role.

Subsequent analyses showed

Focuses on the analytical aspect of the subsequent studies, changing "studies" to "analyses".

Additional studies confirmed

Highlights confirmation of results by the additional studies.

Later analyses confirmed

Similar to "in later research", uses "later" instead of "subsequent" and focuses on analyses.

Following studies demonstrated

Reorders the phrase and uses "demonstrated" to emphasize the conclusive nature of the studies.

Research conducted afterward indicated

Emphasizes the timing of the research and uses "indicated" to express findings.

Subsequent work has explored

Changes "studies" to "work", broadening the scope and using "explored" to denote investigation.

FAQs

How can I use "in subsequent studies" in a sentence?

You can use "in subsequent studies" to refer to research that followed an initial piece of work, like: "The initial trial showed promising results; "in subsequent studies", these findings were validated with a larger sample size."

What's a more formal alternative to "in subsequent studies"?

A more formal alternative could be "in later investigations" or "in follow-up research". For instance, "In later investigations, the correlation was not as strong."

Is it better to say "in subsequent studies" or "in later studies"?

Both "in subsequent studies" and "in later studies" are grammatically correct and convey a similar meaning. The choice depends on the desired level of formality and the specific context. "Subsequent" often implies a more direct connection or continuation from the initial study. You can also use "in further studies".

Can "in subsequent studies" be used to contradict previous findings?

Yes, it can. You might use it to introduce research that challenges or refines earlier conclusions: "The initial study suggested a strong link; however, "in subsequent studies", this association was found to be weaker than initially believed."