in point

USAGE SUMMARY

"in point" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to a relevant or important point in an argument or discussion. For example: "This particular issue is the main point to focus on, and everything else is secondary - at least, in point."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

(Case in point?

The New York Times

Case in point, right?

The New York Times

are a case in point.

The New York Times

Case in point: Thursday afternoon.

The New York Times - Sports

Herewith, a case in point.

The New York Times

Case in point — Justin's dad.

The New Yorker

Hungary a case in point.

The New Yorker

Case in point: the Bartendro.

The New York Times - Tech

Game 4 offered a case in point.

The New York Times - Sports

I believe in point shoes wholeheartedly.

The New York Times - Arts

It is, in point of fact, anathema.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "in point", ensure the example is directly and obviously related to the preceding statement. The connection should be clear to the reader without requiring additional explanation.

Common error

Avoid using "in point" to introduce examples that are only tangentially related to your main argument. Ensure the example directly supports the point you're making, or it will weaken your argument and confuse the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in point" primarily functions as an adjective phrase indicating relevance or pertinence. It typically modifies a noun, emphasizing its appropriateness to the current discussion. As supported by Ludwig AI, it serves to highlight a specific aspect or detail.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

25%

Encyclopedias

15%

Less common in

Science

10%

Reference

8%

Wiki

7%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "in point" functions as an adjective phrase emphasizing relevance and is generally considered grammatically correct. Ludwig AI confirms its usability for indicating a relevant or important point in an argument. While it's considered very common, especially in news and formal writing, writers should ensure that the example introduced is directly related to the preceding statement to avoid weakening their argument. Alternatives such as "relevant", "pertinent", and "case in point" provide similar ways to express pertinence in varied contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

to the point

This indicates something is directly related and important to the matter at hand without unnecessary details.

relevant

This alternative directly indicates the pertinence of something to the matter at hand.

pertinent

Similar to "relevant", this highlights the direct connection and importance of something.

applicable

This suggests that something is suitable or right for a particular situation.

germane

This emphasizes the close relationship and appropriateness of something to what is being considered.

apropos

This indicates that something is very appropriate to a particular situation.

fitting

Indicates that something is suitably aligned with the situation at hand.

on topic

This alternative keeps the focus on the current subject being discussed.

to the purpose

This phrase emphasizes that something is directly related to achieving a specific goal.

on the subject

This keeps the discussion confined to the specific topic.

FAQs

How can I use "in point" in a sentence?

You can use "in point" to introduce a relevant example or evidence that supports a claim. For instance, "The company's success is evident; "in point", their sales have doubled this year."

What are some alternatives to using "in point"?

Alternatives include "for example", "for instance", or "as an illustration", depending on the context and the level of formality you want to convey.

How does "in point" differ from "for example"?

"In point" is generally used to introduce a particularly strong or relevant example that directly supports the argument, whereas "for example" is a more general way to introduce any example.

Is it correct to say "case in point" instead of "in point"?

Yes, "case in point" is a common and often preferred alternative to "in point", carrying the same meaning and usage.