Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
in line with previous
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "in line with previous" is correct and usable in written English.
It generally means that something is consistent with something that happened before it. For example, "The new product launch was successful, in line with previous launches in the same range."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
The filter divisions remains in line with previous expectations.
News & Media
The results are in line with previous studies.
News & Media
This is in line with previous rumors.
News & Media
These results are generally in line with previous validated studies.
These findings are in line with previous neurophysiological research.
These findings are in line with previous reports [12, 13].
The sound quality on the device is solid — in line with previous generations of nanos.
News & Media
The coordination number distribution was in line with previous finding in mono-sized acrylic beads.
Science
Permeability and drainable porosity were reduced by settlement, in line with previous results.
The results are shown to be in line with previous ones.
Additionally, body image worsened with each successive grade level, a finding in line with previous research.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "in line with previous" to clearly indicate that current findings, results, or actions are consistent with what has already been established or observed. It adds credibility and context to your writing.
Common error
Avoid using "in line with previous" repeatedly within a short span of text. Overuse can make your writing sound repetitive and less engaging. Instead, try varying your language by using synonyms or rephrasing your sentences.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "in line with previous" functions as a prepositional phrase that often serves as an adverbial modifier, indicating a relationship of agreement, consistency, or conformity with past events, findings, or expectations. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability.
Frequent in
Science
61%
News & Media
27%
Formal & Business
3%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "in line with previous" is a versatile phrase used to express consistency or agreement with past events or findings. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically sound and widely used, particularly in science, news, and business contexts. When writing, remember that while the phrase is effective, overuse should be avoided. Consider using alternatives like "consistent with prior" or "aligned with former" for variety. As Ludwig's examples show, the phrase helps to provide context and establish credibility in your writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
consistent with prior
Replaces "previous" with "prior", maintaining similar meaning but with slightly different word choice.
consistent with preceding
Replaces "previous" with "preceding", providing a slightly more formal feel while keeping the meaning the same.
aligned with former
Replaces "line with" with "aligned with" and "previous" with "former", keeping the meaning intact.
in accordance with past
Substitutes "line with" for "accordance with" and "previous" for "past", providing a more formal tone.
in agreement with preceding
Employs "agreement with" instead of "line with" and "preceding" for "previous", adding a degree of formality.
corresponding to prior
Replaces "line with" with "corresponding to" and "previous" with "prior", indicating a parallel relationship.
matching earlier
Uses "matching" to convey consistency and "earlier" instead of "previous", offering a simplified version.
congruent with earlier
Uses "congruent with" instead of "in line with", indicating a state of agreement or harmony.
comparable to past
Changes the structure to use "comparable to" while retaining the sense of similarity to earlier instances.
mirroring past
Uses "mirroring" to suggest a close resemblance to what has happened before.
FAQs
How can I use "in line with previous" in a sentence?
You can use "in line with previous" to show consistency or agreement with earlier results, findings, or expectations. For example, "The company's profits were "in line with previous" quarters' results."
What are some alternatives to "in line with previous"?
Alternatives include "consistent with prior", "in accordance with past", or "aligned with former". The choice depends on the specific context and the level of formality you want to convey.
Is it better to say "in line with previous" or "consistent with previous"?
Both "in line with previous" and "consistent with previous" are correct and largely interchangeable. "Consistent with previous" might sound slightly more formal, but the difference is minimal. Use whichever fits best with the tone and flow of your writing.
Can "in line with previous" be used to describe something unexpected?
No, "in line with previous" implies that something is expected and consistent with what has happened before. If something is unexpected, you would use phrases like "in contrast to previous" or "deviating from previous".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested