in direct violation

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "in direct violation" is correct and is usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate that something has violated a rule or regulation in a direct way. For example, "The company was found to be in direct violation of safety standards."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It also listed seven incidents in which Latinos who sought police help were questioned about their immigration status, in direct violation of the directive.

The New York Times

Inside the makeshift station I was told: "You are in direct violation of the law.

The Guardian - Opinion

Of those, it says, at least 492 were in direct violation of the freeze.

The Guardian

Sergeant Kleifgen began an investigation, in direct violation of "don't ask, don't tell".

The New York Times - Magazine

This is in direct violation of various C.I.A. and government rules and regulations.

The New York Times

And in direct violation of the military ethos, these were terms of endearment.

Harvard Business Review

This is in direct violation of FIFRA -- the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.

The Guardian

This provocative attack is reprehensible and is in direct violation of the Armistice Agreement.

The New York Times

This may be in direct violation of the IEEE Code of Ethics and many copyright laws.

Cornell University

"It is my view that being called a puppet is in direct violation of that rule," Mr. Specter said.

The New York Times

This is in direct violation of the cessation of hostilities and there is appalling suffering amongst the population".

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "in direct violation", clearly specify what rule, law, or agreement is being violated to provide context and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid stating that something is "in direct violation" without clearly identifying the specific rule, law, or agreement that is being broken. Vague statements weaken the impact and can lead to misinterpretations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in direct violation" functions as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb or clause by indicating the manner or condition in which an action occurs. As per Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Academia

20%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Science

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "in direct violation" is a commonly used and grammatically correct expression that indicates a clear and obvious breach of a rule, law, or agreement. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is suitable for various contexts, including news, academia, and general writing. To enhance clarity, specify what standard is being violated and avoid vagueness. Related phrases such as "in flagrant breach" or "in clear contravention" can be used to add nuance. Overall, "in direct violation" serves as a strong statement of disapproval, highlighting the severity of non-compliance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in clear contravention

Uses 'clear contravention' instead of 'direct violation', focusing on the indisputable nature of the contradiction or breach.

in plain contradiction

Uses 'plain contradiction' instead of 'direct violation', highlighting the straightforward and unambiguous nature of the contradiction.

in flagrant breach

Replaces 'direct violation' with 'flagrant breach', emphasizing the obvious and intentional nature of the breach.

in gross non-compliance

Replaces 'direct violation' with 'gross non-compliance', stressing a severe failure to adhere to rules or standards.

in blatant disregard

Substitutes 'direct violation' with 'blatant disregard', highlighting a contemptuous lack of attention or respect.

in express conflict

Replaces 'direct violation' with 'express conflict', highlighting a distinct and unambiguous opposition to a rule or agreement.

in open defiance

Replaces 'direct violation' with 'open defiance', stressing a deliberate and public resistance to authority or rules.

in absolute derogation

Replaces 'direct violation' with 'absolute derogation', stressing the complete and utter disregard for a rule or standard.

in patent infringement

Uses 'patent infringement' to specify a direct violation, focusing on the obvious and undeniable nature of the infringement.

in stark opposition

Substitutes 'direct violation' with 'stark opposition', emphasizing a sharp and clear contrast or resistance.

FAQs

How can I use "in direct violation" in a sentence?

You can use "in direct violation" to indicate that someone or something is breaking a rule, law, or agreement. For example, "The company's actions were "in direct violation" of environmental regulations".

What are some alternatives to saying "in direct violation"?

Alternatives include "in blatant disregard", "in clear contravention", or "in flagrant breach" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "in direct violation of" or "in direct violation to"?

The correct preposition to use is "of". Therefore, "in direct violation of" is the grammatically correct and standard phrasing.

What's the difference between "in direct violation" and "in violation"?

"In direct violation" emphasizes that the violation is clear, obvious, and without ambiguity. Simply saying "in violation" implies a breach, but not necessarily a blatant or undeniable one.