in direct conflict

USAGE SUMMARY

"in direct conflict" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used to describe two opposing sides or ideas that are struggling against each other. For example: "The students were in direct conflict with the school administration over the new rules."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That places her in direct conflict with the Navy.

The New York Times

4. Goldman's interests are often in direct conflict with ours.

The New York Times

Often, societal concerns over language and nudity are in direct conflict with artistic prerogatives.

The New York Times - Arts

His activities ultimately put him in direct conflict with St . Petersburgs elected leaders.

The New York Times

Dr. Baker's opinion is in direct conflict with the claims of the Agriculture Department.

The New Yorker

That position puts the group in direct conflict with Mr. da Silva's government.

The New York Times

"They put public policy in direct conflict with their base voters".

The New York Times - Magazine

The matter has put him in direct conflict with Mr. Blair's government.

The New York Times

"It was in direct conflict with his interests and our interests".

The New York Times - Arts

"The Northeast has been in direct conflict with us on oil and gas and agriculture".

The New York Times

The regulation appeared to be in direct conflict with Chinese civil law.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "in direct conflict", ensure that the subjects being compared are clearly defined and that the nature of the conflict is evident from the context. This will help avoid ambiguity and strengthen your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "in direct conflict" when the disagreement is minor or indirect. This phrase implies a significant clash or opposition, so using a weaker term might be more appropriate for less severe situations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in direct conflict" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a verb or noun to indicate a state of opposition or antagonism. It highlights a clash between two or more entities. Ludwig confirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

15%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "in direct conflict" is a common and grammatically correct prepositional phrase used to express significant opposition or antagonism between two or more entities. Analysis of various sources by Ludwig indicates that it is frequently used in News & Media, Science, and Encyclopedias, showcasing its versatility across different registers. Ludwig AI validates its grammatical correctness and usability in written English. When employing this phrase, ensure that the subjects are clearly defined and the conflict is significant to avoid misinterpretations. Alternatives like "at odds" or "in opposition" can be used to convey similar meanings with slightly different emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

at odds

This alternative is a more concise and informal way of saying that two things are not in agreement.

in opposition

This alternative highlights the act of actively opposing something, suggesting a more deliberate stance.

in disagreement

This alternative focuses on the lack of consensus or shared opinion between two parties.

in contradiction

This alternative emphasizes the logical inconsistency between two statements or ideas.

diametrically opposed

This alternative intensifies the sense of opposition, suggesting that the two things are completely opposite.

incompatible

This alternative focuses on the inability of two things to coexist or work together harmoniously.

antagonistic to

This alternative implies an active hostility or animosity between two things.

irreconcilable

This alternative emphasizes the impossibility of resolving the differences between two things.

on a collision course

This alternative uses a metaphorical image to suggest that two things are headed for a clash.

mutually exclusive

This alternative highlights that two concepts or options cannot exist simultaneously; choosing one precludes the other.

FAQs

How can I use "in direct conflict" in a sentence?

Use "in direct conflict" to describe situations where two entities, ideas, or forces are opposing each other significantly. For instance, "The proposed policy is "in direct conflict" with the company's values."

What can I say instead of "in direct conflict"?

You can use alternatives like "at odds", "in opposition", or "in disagreement" depending on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct, "in direct conflict" or "in direct contradiction"?

Both phrases are correct, but they emphasize different aspects. "In direct conflict" suggests a struggle or clash, while "in direct contradiction" highlights a logical inconsistency. Choose the phrase that best reflects the nature of the opposition.

What's the difference between "in direct conflict" and "in slight disagreement"?

"In direct conflict" implies a strong, significant opposition. "In slight disagreement" suggests a minor difference of opinion. Use "in direct conflict" when the opposition is substantial and consequential; otherwise, opt for a milder phrase.