in depth enough

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "in depth enough" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the thoroughness or comprehensiveness of information or analysis provided on a particular topic. Example: "The report was detailed, but I wonder if it was in depth enough to cover all the necessary aspects of the issue."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

As pointed out by Williams et al. [ 3], tutorial videos are not always in depth enough to provide a full understanding of the resource to users.

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

It doesn't go in-depth enough.

The New York Times

It's straightforward for irregular Facebook users to grasp but in-depth enough to bring value to the confident ones.

The Guardian - Tech

"This report is too short; it just isn't in-depth enough to tell us anything.

Vice

The only safe bet, in looking at the Tea Partiers versus Republicans, is that after the election very few people are going to do analysis that is in-depth enough to really figure out what happened.

Huffington Post

The chapters on haematological malignancies, while perhaps not in-depth enough for the trainee haematologist, give a detailed insight for the oncologist or general physician.

British Journal of Cancer

Relative to the academically rigorous level required to publish in international journals, the majority of research projects in Argentina was perceived to be small and not rigorous or in-depth enough to warrant international journal standards.

Health Policy and Planning

Isn't the original way of encountering "Winterreise," in all its glory and matchless depth, enough for us?

The New Yorker

The result of this test indicates that a 5-km difference in depth is enough to be significant shown in Additional file 3: Figure S2.

Earth, Planets and Space

The sequencing data, though relatively low in depth, are enough to well satisfy our analyses, as we shall discuss below.

BMC Plant Biology

But the 400 recipes and 50 in-depth techniques are enough to grab the interest of even the most experienced cook.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When evaluating whether a study or analysis is "in depth enough", consider the specific requirements of your audience and the complexity of the topic. Tailor the level of detail to meet those needs effectively.

Common error

Avoid using overly complex vocabulary when a simpler expression like "detailed enough" would suffice. Clarity is key to effective communication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in depth enough" functions as an adjectival modifier, describing the extent or degree to which something provides sufficient detail or analysis. It is typically used to evaluate whether the level of detail is adequate for a specific purpose. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase is deemed grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "in depth enough" is a grammatically sound phrase used to evaluate whether something provides a sufficient level of detail or analysis. As supported by Ludwig AI, its primary function is to assess the thoroughness of information, making it suitable for neutral to formal contexts. While not exceedingly common, it is frequently found in news and scientific domains. When using this phrase, consider the specific needs of your audience and aim for clarity, potentially opting for simpler alternatives like "sufficiently detailed" to avoid unnecessary complexity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

detailed enough

Simplifies the phrase, focusing solely on the level of detail.

thorough enough

Highlights the thoroughness of the analysis or information.

sufficiently thorough

Similar to "thorough enough" but uses a more formal tone.

sufficiently detailed

Replaces "in depth enough" with a more concise term emphasizing adequate detail.

amply detailed

Indicates that the level of detail is more than sufficient.

adequately comprehensive

Focuses on the completeness of the information provided.

adequately explored

Focuses on whether a topic has been examined with sufficient depth.

sufficiently exhaustive

Emphasizes the completeness and comprehensiveness of the coverage.

elaborate enough

Suggests that the subject has been developed with sufficient detail.

sufficiently profound

Focuses on the depth of understanding achieved.

FAQs

How can I use "in depth enough" in a sentence?

You can use "in depth enough" to describe something that has sufficient detail or thoroughness. For example, "The analysis wasn't "in depth enough" to draw firm conclusions."

What are some alternatives to "in depth enough"?

Alternatives include "sufficiently detailed", "thorough enough", or "adequately comprehensive". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to say "in depth enough" or "deep enough"?

"In depth enough" typically refers to the level of detail or analysis, while "deep enough" can refer to literal depth or the profundity of an idea. Use "in depth enough" when discussing thoroughness.

When is it appropriate to use "in depth enough" in formal writing?

It is appropriate in formal writing when you need to assess whether something provides a sufficient level of detail or analysis to meet the requirements of the task or audience. For example, "The report needs to be "in depth enough" to satisfy the committee's concerns."