in conflicts with

USAGE SUMMARY

"in conflicts with" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
You can use it when you want to describe two or more ideas, people, events, etc. that are in disagreement or opposition. For example, "The lawyer argued that his client's testimony was in conflict with the evidence presented in court."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

— resulting in conflicts with non-Mormons.

The New York Times

Shot and wounded numerous times in conflicts with security forces.

The Guardian

When people resisted, some 20,000 were killed in conflicts with the French colonial authorities.

The New York Times - Arts

Even more frighteningly, 5,412 people died in conflicts with the police.

The Guardian - Opinion

She took over a department mired in conflicts with many states.

The New York Times

Her brothers, they said, had been killed in conflicts with American-led forces.

The New York Times

Zürich became embroiled in conflicts with neighbouring territories, but economic growth continued relatively unimpeded.

Britannica

Students represent low-income taxpayers in conflicts with the Internal Revenue Service.

Harvard University

Historically, Russia has held the upper hand in conflicts with China.

The New Yorker

This behavior can result in conflicts with other trail users, landowners, hunters and conservationists.

Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism

Israel engaged in conflicts with Judah and, sometimes jointly with Judah, against foreign powers.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "in conflicts with", ensure the sentence clearly identifies both parties involved in the disagreement or opposition.

Common error

Avoid using "in conflicts with" without specifying who or what is involved in the conflict. Be specific to avoid ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in conflicts with" functions as a prepositional phrase, indicating a state of opposition, disagreement, or contention between two or more entities. Ludwig showcases its frequent use across varied contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Science

33%

Encyclopedias

8%

Less common in

Academia

7%

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The analysis reveals that "in conflicts with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used prepositional phrase, used to denote disagreement or opposition between two or more entities. As Ludwig confirms, its register is generally neutral, making it suitable for various contexts, from formal writing in news and academic sources to less formal communication. While alternatives like "in opposition to" or "at odds with" exist, "in conflicts with" effectively conveys a sense of discord and contention. When using this phrase, clarity is key: ensure the sentence clearly specifies who or what is involved in the opposition. This avoids vagueness and strengthens the impact of the statement. Therefore, "in conflicts with" is a valuable tool for expressing disagreement, provided it is used with precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in disagreement with

A more general term for not being in accord.

in opposition to

Indicates a direct and often ideological disagreement.

clashing with

Suggests a direct and forceful confrontation.

at odds with

Implies a state of disagreement or tension.

in contention with

Implies a dispute or rivalry.

contending with

Suggests active struggle or competition.

in rivalry with

Focuses on competitive antagonism.

at loggerheads with

Suggests a state of prolonged and bitter disagreement.

in defiance of

Implies a deliberate act of resistance.

locked in battle with

Describes a more intense, combative disagreement.

FAQs

How can I use "in conflicts with" in a sentence?

Use "in conflicts with" to show a state of disagreement, opposition, or struggle between two or more entities. For instance, "The new policy is "in conflicts with" existing regulations."

What are some alternatives to "in conflicts with"?

Alternatives include "in opposition to", "at odds with", or "in disagreement with". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you wish to convey.

Is it more appropriate to use "in conflict with" or "in conflicts with"?

Both are correct, but "in conflict with" typically refers to a general state of discord, while "in conflicts with" suggests multiple or repeated instances of disagreement or opposition.

What is the difference between "in conflicts with" and "contending with"?

"In conflicts with" indicates a state of opposition, while "contending with" suggests an active struggle or competition. Therefore, "contending with" implies a more dynamic engagement.