in a practical receiver

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "in a practical receiver" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the characteristics or features of a receiver that is designed for practical applications or real-world use. Example: "The design of the device ensures that it operates efficiently in a practical receiver, allowing for better signal clarity."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

This is realistic in a practical receiver.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

The transmItter and receiver filter impulshouldponses are, and.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

In a practical receiver, an adaptive algorithm (similar to a timing error detector [40]) could be used to compute τ ̂ ML.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

In a practical receiver with analog I/Q separation, I/ Qmismatch always exists and contributes as interference in general CFO estimation.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Unfortunately, the residual self-interference still exists after interference suppression in the practical receiver architecture and it also impairs the performance of FD relay networks as [17 21, 27].

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Various realistic assumptions are incorporated into the problem, which make the study valuable for performance assessment of real cellular networks to identify potentials for performance improvements in practical receiver designs.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

However, the computation complexity for the inverse matrix calculation required at every symbol is relatively higher which leads to a serious problem in the implementation of practical receiver.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

The mirror-frequency attenuation is described by the image rejection ratio (IRR) of the receiver RF front-end, K 1 K 2 2, which is typically in the order of 25 40 dB[15] in practical receivers.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

In many practical receivers, the suboptimal metrics become preferred choices due to their simplicity and reasonable performance.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

The complexity of the non-iterative MMSE scheme[27] that is popularly used in practical receivers, referred to as MMSE-OND2 in this article, is also computed.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Both are also methodical runners, though each has a chance to be a practical inside receiver in this system.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing receiver design, specify what makes the design "practical". For example, is it low cost, low power, or easily implementable?

Common error

Avoid simply stating that a receiver is "practical" without specifying why it is so. Back up your claim with quantifiable metrics or specific design choices that contribute to its real-world applicability.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in a practical receiver" functions as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb or adjective by specifying the context or conditions under which something occurs. Ludwig AI shows that the phrase is often used to qualify statements about the design, performance, or limitations of receiver systems.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

12%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "in a practical receiver" is used to contextualize statements about receiver design, emphasizing real-world applicability. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct, though relatively rare. It appears most frequently in scientific contexts, highlighting considerations for feasibility, cost, and performance under real-world limitations. When using this phrase, ensure you clarify why a design is considered "practical", backing up your claim with specific metrics or design choices. Related phrases include "in a real-world receiver" and "in a realistic receiver", which can provide alternative ways to express the same concept.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in a real-world receiver

Replaces "practical" with "real-world" for emphasis on actual scenarios.

in a realistic receiver

Substitutes "practical" with "realistic", highlighting the achievability of the receiver's design.

in an actual receiver implementation

Replaces "practical receiver" with a more descriptive phrase indicating a tangible realization of a receiver.

within a feasible receiver design

Shifts the focus to the feasibility of the receiver's design itself.

considering a receiver's practical aspects

Changes the structure to focus on the practical considerations of a receiver.

in a functionally viable receiver

Replaces "practical" with "functionally viable", stressing the operational aspect.

in a commercially available receiver

Highlights receivers that are available for purchase, focusing on commercial applications.

in an applied receiver system

Emphasizes the application of the receiver in a broader system context.

in a hands-on receiver setup

Focuses on a practical, hands-on approach to setting up a receiver.

given a pragmatic receiver configuration

Uses "pragmatic" to convey the same sense of real-world applicability and efficiency.

FAQs

How can I use "in a practical receiver" in a sentence?

Use "in a practical receiver" to describe design choices, limitations, or performance characteristics of a receiver intended for real-world applications. For example: "The dynamic range is bounded, which is realistic "in a practical receiver"."

What does "practical" mean when referring to a receiver?

When describing a receiver, "practical" typically implies that the design is feasible to implement, cost-effective, and performs well under real-world conditions, considering limitations such as component availability, power consumption, and environmental factors.

Which is more appropriate: "realistic" or "practical" receiver?

While both terms are similar, "realistic receiver" often focuses on the achievability of the design, whereas "practical receiver" emphasizes its suitability for actual use, encompassing factors like cost and ease of implementation. You can use alternatives like "real-world receiver".

What are some common limitations "in a practical receiver" design?

Common limitations include constraints on computational complexity, power consumption, component tolerances, and the need for robustness against interference and channel impairments. Designers must often make trade-offs to balance performance with practicality.