imputed with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'imputed with' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to attribute an action or quality to someone or something. For example: The student was imputed with being lazy by his teacher.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Missing data were imputed with multiple imputation procedures using NORM, version 2, software (32).

Diabetes Care

Missing data will be imputed with multiple imputation techniques [ 56, 57].

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Missing covariate data were imputed with multiple imputation using IVEwareE [ 16].

Genome Medicine

If there are many missing data, the missing data will be imputed with multiple imputation techniques.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Missing covariate values were imputed with multiple imputation by chained equations.

British Medical Journal

These missing covariates were imputed with a multiple imputation model.

Critical Care

Missing values were imputed with 10 multiple imputations for confounding factors.

Cancer Causes and Control

Missing data were imputed with 10-nearest-neighbor imputation [39].

Plosone

After the evaluation of the three imputation methods, all chromosomes were imputed with Impute2.

Genetics, Selection, Evolution

Missing data was imputed with the STATA multiple imputation by chained equations procedure.

BMC Health Services Research

No doubt, too, Rampling was sick of being imputed with a personality that was not hers.

The Guardian - Film

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "imputed with" in scientific writing, clearly define the method of imputation used (e.g. multiple imputation, mean imputation) to maintain transparency and reproducibility.

Common error

Avoid using "impute to" when you mean "imputed with". "Imputed with" correctly indicates the assignment of a value or characteristic. "Impute to" is less common and can sound awkward.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "imputed with" functions as a passive construction indicating that something has been assigned or filled in using a specific method or value. Ludwig AI confirms the correctness and usability of this phrase in written English. It's commonly used in research and data analysis contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

90%

News & Media

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Academia

1%

Wiki

0.5%

Encyclopedias

0.5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "imputed with" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed term, especially within scientific and technical domains. According to Ludwig, it's correctly used to indicate the assignment of a value, method, or characteristic, particularly when dealing with missing data or incomplete information. While its primary context lies in academic and research settings, it can also be found in general usage. Remember to specify the imputation method for clarity and avoid confusing it with similar-sounding phrases. Alternatives like "attributed to" or "associated with" can be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. By following these guidelines, you can effectively and accurately use the phrase "imputed with" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

attributed to

Highlights the act of assigning a cause, origin, or characteristic to something, often in a more formal or academic context.

ascribed to

Similar to "attributed to", but often used when the attribution is based on inference or assumption rather than concrete evidence.

credited with

Emphasizes the act of giving someone credit or recognition for something, implying a positive association.

recognized for

Highlights the acknowledged possession of a particular quality or achievement.

associated with

Focuses on a general connection or relationship between two things, without necessarily implying causality or direct attribution.

charged with

Often used in legal contexts to denote a formal accusation of wrongdoing.

blamed for

Specifically indicates assigning responsibility for a negative outcome or fault.

endowed with

Suggests being naturally provided or gifted with a particular quality or attribute.

invested with

Implies granting or bestowing a particular power, right, or quality upon someone or something.

identified by

Focuses on a feature or characteristic that serves to distinguish or recognize something.

FAQs

How is "imputed with" typically used in academic writing?

In academic writing, "imputed with" is often used to describe how missing data points are handled in statistical analysis. For example, "Missing values were "imputed with the mean" of the available data".

What are some alternatives to "imputed with" that maintain a similar meaning?

Alternatives to "imputed with" include "attributed to", "associated with", or "credited with", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "the missing data was imputed by the researcher" instead of "imputed with"?

Yes, "the missing data was imputed by the researcher" is grammatically correct, but it focuses on the actor (the researcher). "Imputed with" focuses on the method or value used for imputation. For instance: "The missing data was "imputed with a regression model"".

Can "imputed with" be used in contexts other than data analysis?

Yes, although less common, "imputed with" can be used more broadly to mean attributed or associated. For example, "The ancient statue was "imputed with magical properties" by the local villagers".