implicit perils

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "implicit perils" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to dangers or risks that are not immediately obvious or are hidden within a situation or context. Example: "In the world of finance, there are often implicit perils that investors must be aware of before making decisions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Mr. Penn, even more than Mr. Krakauer, takes the Emersonian dimension of Chris McCandless's project seriously, even as he understands the peril implicit in too close an identification with nature.

The New York Times

And, even as the G.O.P. continues to inveigh against the perils of deficits, the implicit message it'll send by nominating Romney is quite different: Debt for me, but not for thee.

The New Yorker

But by being New Yorkers, by not living as if under siege -- even as new walls and guns appear, as they have in all great cities under peril -- what might seem like denial is an implicit defense.

The New York Times

Implicit judgment".

The New York Times

Perils, indeed.

The New Yorker

The Perils of Pauline.

Columbia University

"The Perils of Pleasure?

Columbia University

The Perils of Positivity.

Harvard University

Implicit perception.

University of California, Berkeley

Implicit Differentiation.

Stanford University

Both routes have perils.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "implicit perils", ensure the context clearly suggests the potential negative consequences that are not immediately obvious. For instance, "The implicit perils of rapid technological advancement include job displacement and increased social inequality."

Common error

Avoid using "implicit perils" in situations where the dangers are already well-known or obvious. The phrase is most effective when highlighting risks that require deeper understanding or foresight.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "implicit perils" functions as a noun phrase where "implicit" modifies "perils". According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically correct and used to describe dangers that are not immediately obvious or readily apparent. Examples from Ludwig showcase it in contexts of identifying underlying risks.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Academia

25%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

15%

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "implicit perils" is a grammatically sound phrase used to denote hidden or non-obvious dangers. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and utility in various contexts. Although relatively infrequent, its primary function is to highlight potential risks that might be easily overlooked, prompting a more cautious and thorough evaluation. This phrase finds its place predominantly in news, academic, and scientific discussions, lending a tone of sophistication and precision. By understanding its nuances and applying it judiciously, writers can effectively underscore hidden threats and encourage more informed decision-making.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

unseen dangers

Focuses on the lack of visibility of the dangers, emphasizing that they are not easily noticed.

hidden risks

Highlights the concealed nature of the risks involved, suggesting they are not apparent at first glance.

latent threats

Emphasizes the potential for future harm, suggesting the threats are currently dormant but could emerge.

underlying hazards

Indicates that the hazards are fundamental and exist beneath the surface, requiring careful examination to uncover.

unrecognized dangers

Focuses on the fact that the dangers are not acknowledged or understood by those involved.

tacit risks

Highlights risks that are understood or implied without being directly stated.

covert threats

Suggests threats that are concealed and operate in secret.

subtle dangers

Emphasizes that the dangers are delicate and not easily detected.

unspoken risks

Highlights the fact that the risks are not explicitly mentioned or addressed.

unexpressed threats

Indicates that the threats are not openly communicated or voiced.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "implicit perils" in a sentence?

Use "implicit perils" to highlight hidden or not immediately obvious dangers within a given situation. For example, "The "implicit perils" of relying solely on renewable energy sources include intermittency and storage challenges."

What phrases can I use instead of "implicit perils"?

You can use alternatives like "hidden risks", "unseen dangers", or "underlying hazards" depending on the specific context. For instance, "The "hidden risks" of globalization include economic instability and cultural homogenization."

What is the difference between "implicit perils" and "explicit dangers"?

"Implicit perils" refer to dangers that are not openly stated or immediately obvious, while "explicit dangers" are those that are clearly identified and acknowledged. Understanding the difference is crucial for risk assessment and mitigation.

Is it always necessary to specify the "implicit perils" when using the phrase?

While not always necessary, specifying the nature of the "implicit perils" can provide clarity and strengthen your argument. For example, instead of just saying "There are "implicit perils"", you could say "The "implicit perils" of this policy include unintended consequences for small businesses."