implications for security

USAGE SUMMARY

'implications for security' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when referring to the potential effects that a given event or situation could have on a sense of safety or security. For example, you could say, "This new policy could have serious implications for security."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

14 human-written examples

The case also had lasting implications for security screening at American airports.

The Guardian

Russia is replacing and upgrading its six nuclear icebreakers, a piece of civilian infrastructure with implications for security too.

The Economist

Even something like sea level rise requires pretty fine grained analysis if one is to discern possible implications for security.

The New York Times

Shoring up Afghanistan's fledgling security forces to prepare them to conduct counterinsurgency operations on their own has far-reaching implications for security here, too, particularly in many provinces and villages that still face violence from Taliban fighters.

The New York Times

In an added complication with serious implications for security in Pakistan, the handlers and facilitators in that attack were from Punjab, Pakistan's most populous and strategic province, which itself has been the target of a series of suicide bombings and commando-style attacks since March.

The New York Times

The US is highly alarmed at the prospect of any increase in tensions between Pakistan and India, not only because of the broad implications for security in the region (both countries possess nuclear weapons) but also because any deployment of Pakistani troops to its eastern border (with India) would lessen its effectiveness fighting militants in its north-western areas (bordering Afghanistan).

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

43 human-written examples

In May, five web security experts published a 17-page analysis of the legislation's implications for online security, concluding, "The PROTECT IP Act would weaken this important effort to improve Internet security.

Huffington Post

Given the tight if murky links between the Russian security apparatus and the quasi-fascist Nationalist movement with which Shamir is associated there, it has worrying implications for the security of anyone named in the cables.

The Guardian - Opinion

What about the implications for national security?

The Guardian - Opinion

What are the implications for job security, house affordability and salaries?

The Guardian - Money

"We will assess the latest developments and their implications for the security of the alliance.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing policies or events, clearly articulate the specific "implications for security", detailing potential impacts rather than making vague statements.

Common error

Avoid exaggerating the "implications for security" without sufficient evidence. Ensure your claims are supported by facts and logical reasoning to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "implications for security" functions as a noun phrase that highlights the potential consequences or effects related to safety and protection. According to Ludwig AI, it is correct and usable in written English. Examples provided by Ludwig illustrate its use in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "implications for security" effectively conveys the potential consequences stemming from various actions or events, especially concerning safety and protection. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and broadly applicable in written English. While often found in neutral to formal contexts such as news media and scientific publications, it maintains accessibility without resorting to overly informal language. The phrase's strength lies in its ability to raise awareness and prompt thorough evaluations of potential impacts, making it a valuable tool for discussing complex issues with widespread ramifications. While alternatives like "security ramifications" or "effects on security" exist, the specific context should guide the choice for optimal clarity and impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Effects on security

Replaces 'implications for' with 'effects on', a more direct and simpler phrasing.

Impact on security

Substitutes 'implications for' with 'impact on', indicating a direct influence.

Consequences for security

Replaces "implications" with "consequences", suggesting a more serious outcome.

Security ramifications

Swaps 'implications for' with the single word 'ramifications', creating a more concise phrase.

Security repercussions

Uses 'repercussions' instead of 'implications', implying potential negative consequences for security.

Security vulnerabilities introduced

More specific; highlights the introduction of weaknesses in security.

Threats to security

Focuses on the dangers or risks posed to security.

Security risks

Emphasizes potential dangers or hazards related to security.

Security considerations

Shifts the focus to aspects that need to be taken into account regarding security.

Security challenges

Highlights the difficulties or problems that security faces.

FAQs

How can I use "implications for security" in a sentence?

You can use "implications for security" to discuss the potential impact of an action or event on safety and protection. For example, "The proposed budget cuts have serious "implications for security" at the border."

What are some alternatives to "implications for security"?

Some alternatives include "security ramifications", "effects on security", or "impact on security". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

What's the difference between "implications for security" and "threats to security"?

"Implications for security" refers to the potential consequences or effects, while "threats to security" refers to specific dangers or risks. "Implications for security" is broader, encompassing both positive and negative effects, whereas "threats to security" focuses on potential harm.

Is it correct to say "security implications" instead of "implications for security"?

While "security implications" is understandable, "implications for security" is generally preferred in formal writing because it clearly indicates that the implications are related to security. "Security implications" can sometimes be ambiguous.