implement harm

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "implement harm" is grammatically correct but may not be commonly used in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing the execution of actions that cause damage or injury, often in a technical or policy-related discussion. Example: "The new policy could inadvertently implement harm to vulnerable populations if not carefully evaluated."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

A great step is looking at how we can implement harm reduction philosophies and policies.

Vice

Rather than implement harm reduction policies or limits on big festivals, Rodriguez maintains that the government cracked down on clubs across the board.

Vice

Once we started understanding the role of harm reduction in our community life, we began to implement harm reduction outreach by providing HIV testing, condoms, and helping people learn to protect themselves.

Huffington Post

Since ART not only saves lives but also reduces the risk of HIV transmission the failure to reach PWID with ART compounds the failure to implement harm reduction and underpins the region's escalating concentrated HIV epidemic.

Huffington Post

The coalition of activists, state and local governments, and researchers that have worked very hard to implement harm reduction programs in the US are almost absent from this paper.

Huffington Post

Viet Nam was slow to implement harm reduction interventions that targeted drug users.

BMC Public Health

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

The review highlighted "failures of governance and risk management" and found "Crown will need to be innovative and proactive in effectively implementing harm minimisation strategies over the coming period".

The Guardian

Every dollar spent on methadone treatment is estimated to save $7. Five Labor and three Conservative governments adopted harm minimisation as Australia's official national drug policy on 2 April 1985 and every Commonwealth, state and territory government since then has implemented harm minimisation programmes.

The Guardian - Opinion

The National HIV Law of 2006 and Decree 108/2007 give directives for implementing harm reduction interventions including needle/syringe exchange, opioid substitution treatment and condom distribution.

BMC Public Health

We acknowledge that harm reduction programs have faced community opposition [ 61- 63], which might restrict their integration into these settings, yet several health and end-of-life care service providers have nonetheless successfully implemented harm reduction approaches.

BMC Public Health

Although several low-threshold hospices have implemented harm reduction policies (i.e.: permitting onsite prescribed alcohol use, providing injecting equipment and permitting off-site illicit drug use), this end-of-life care service delivery model has not been widely implemented.

BMC Public Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In professional writing, "implement harm" suggests a critical or analytical tone, often implying a need for change or mitigation.

Common error

The phrase "implement harm" is not suited for everyday conversation or informal writing. Overusing it can make your writing sound overly formal or accusatory. Use more common phrases like "cause damage" or "do harm" in less formal settings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "implement harm" functions as a verb phrase, where "implement" acts as a transitive verb taking "harm" as its direct object. This structure denotes the execution or application of actions that result in negative consequences. Ludwig provides examples where this phrase is used in discussions of policy and strategic decisions.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "implement harm" is a grammatically sound phrase used to describe the execution of actions or policies that result in negative consequences. According to Ludwig, it is most frequently encountered in News & Media and Science contexts, indicating a formal and analytical register. While not exceptionally common, its usage is consistent and understandable. The phrase carries a critical or analytical tone, often highlighting the need for change or mitigation. Be mindful of the register and ensure the context justifies the deliberate and somewhat accusatory nature of the phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

inflict damage

Focuses on the act of causing damage, often physical or tangible.

cause detriment

Emphasizes the negative impact or disadvantage resulting from an action.

perpetrate damage

Highlights the execution or commission of an act causing damage.

bring about harm

Focuses on the causation aspect, suggesting the action leads to harm.

give rise to harm

Emphasizes the role of the action as the origin or source of the harm.

put into effect damage

Emphasizes the official or formal enactment of a damaging action.

actualize damage

Stresses the realization or materialization of damage.

put into action damage

Highlights the process of putting a plan that result in damage into operation or effect.

begin doing harm

Emphasizes the initiation of an activity with negative impact.

inaugurate harm

Emphasizes the beginning or formal introduction of harmful circumstances.

FAQs

How can the phrase "implement harm" be used in a sentence?

The phrase "implement harm" is used to describe the act of putting into effect actions or policies that result in negative consequences. For example, "The new regulations could inadvertently "implement harm" to small businesses."

What are some alternative phrases to "implement harm"?

You can use alternatives such as "cause harm", "inflict damage", or "bring about harm", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it more appropriate to say "implement harm" or "cause harm"?

While both phrases are grammatically correct, ""implement harm"" suggests a more deliberate or systematic action, often related to policies or plans. "cause harm" is a more general term for any action that leads to negative outcomes.

What distinguishes "implement harm" from "perpetrate damage"?

"Implement harm" emphasizes the execution or application of something that results in harm, whereas "perpetrate damage" focuses more on the commission of the act that causes the damage, often implying wrongdoing.