impeccable reasoning

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "impeccable reasoning" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a line of thought or argument that is flawless and without any errors. Example: "Her impeccable reasoning during the debate won her the admiration of the judges and the audience alike."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

His reasoning is impeccable.

The New York Times - Books

It turned out my friend was joking, but even so, his reasoning was impeccable.

The New York Times - Magazine

And the reasoning looks impeccable: if Goliath were Lump1, then each would have to have all of the same properties as "the other"; since they have different properties, they must not be identical.

SEP

Nicomachus is not concerned with musical practice but with "what pure reasoning can reveal about the properties of a rationally impeccable and unalterable system of quantitative relations" (Barker 2007, 447).

SEP

Absolutely impeccable.

The Guardian - Sport

SERVICE: Impeccable.

The New York Times

Sound: Impeccable.

The Guardian - Music

Impeccable character?

The New York Times

Impeccable credentials.

The New Yorker

Reasoning: E.

The New York Times - Sports

Her reasoning?

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "impeccable reasoning" when you want to emphasize that a line of thought is not only logical but also flawless and convincing. It adds a touch of sophistication to your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "impeccable reasoning" in very casual or informal settings. It can sound overly formal or pretentious in everyday conversations. Choose a simpler phrase like "good reasoning" or "makes sense" instead.

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "impeccable reasoning" is to act as a noun phrase where "impeccable" modifies the noun "reasoning". Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in describing a line of thought or argument.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "impeccable reasoning" is a phrase used to describe a line of thought or argument that is flawless and convincing. According to Ludwig AI, it's grammatically correct, although relatively rare. It finds use in News & Media and Scientific contexts and is best suited for formal situations. Alternatives include "flawless logic" or "unassailable logic". While effective, avoid overuse in informal settings to maintain a natural tone.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

flawless logic

Emphasizes the absence of errors in the logical process.

unassailable logic

Highlights the impossibility of attacking or refuting the logic.

faultless reasoning

Stresses the absence of faults or mistakes in the reasoning process.

irrefutable logic

Indicates that the logic cannot be disproved or denied.

sound reasoning

Focuses on the reliability and validity of the reasoning.

watertight argument

Implies that the argument is so well-constructed it cannot be breached.

bulletproof rationale

Suggests that the reasoning is so strong it can withstand any criticism.

airtight case

Highlights a comprehensive and undeniable set of reasons.

unimpeachable rationale

Suggests the rationale is beyond reproach or question.

compelling justification

Focuses on the convincing and persuasive nature of the reasoning.

FAQs

How can I use "impeccable reasoning" in a sentence?

You can use "impeccable reasoning" to describe a line of thought or argument that is flawless and without any errors. For example: "Her "impeccable reasoning" during the debate won her the admiration of the judges and the audience alike."

What are some alternatives to "impeccable reasoning"?

Alternatives include "flawless logic", "unassailable logic", or "faultless reasoning". The best choice depends on the specific context.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "impeccable reasoning"?

It is appropriate in formal writing or discussions where you want to emphasize the exceptional quality and validity of a line of thought, especially in academic, professional, or analytical contexts.

What distinguishes "impeccable reasoning" from "good reasoning"?

"Impeccable reasoning" implies a higher standard of flawlessness and persuasiveness compared to "good reasoning". It suggests that the reasoning is not only valid but also exceptionally well-constructed and convincing.