Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

immediately followed

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"immediately followed" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when you are describing an action that occurred directly after another action. For example, "He slammed the door shut and immediately followed it with a roar of laughter."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

(He immediately followed orders).

The Telegraph immediately followed suit.

2," immediately followed and brought $31.4 million.

No other Arabs immediately followed suit.

News & Media

The New York Times

Almost immediately followed a second, penetrating frost.

But then additional fast days often immediately followed.

News & Media

The New York Times

Sunday's final will be immediately followed by You're Hired.

The protest Friday immediately followed Friday Prayer at a mosque.

News & Media

The New York Times

Lingard's trademark Drake-inspired flute celebration immediately followed.

This dissent was immediately followed, however, by more belligerence.

Adams's own base of Massachusetts immediately followed suit.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "immediately followed" to clearly indicate that one event occurred directly after another, ensuring your writing is precise and avoids ambiguity. For example, "The announcement was made, and it was "immediately followed" by a press conference".

Common error

Avoid using "immediately followed" when the events overlap or occur simultaneously. This phrase indicates a clear sequence, not concurrence. For example, don't say 'The applause immediately followed his speech as he was still speaking'. Instead, consider using 'occurred during' or 'accompanied'.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "immediately followed" functions as an adverbial modifier, indicating the timing of an action or event in direct relation to a preceding one. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's a grammatically sound phrase commonly used to establish a clear sequence.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

63%

Science

18%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "immediately followed" is a grammatically sound adverbial modifier used to indicate that one event occurs directly after another. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage is correct and common across diverse contexts, particularly in news and media, and scientific writing. While versatile, it is important to avoid using "immediately followed" when events overlap; ensure a clear sequence for accurate application. Alternatives such as "instantly succeeded" or "directly ensued" can offer nuanced variations in tone and emphasis. By understanding its proper function and context, writers can effectively convey the precise timing of events and actions.

FAQs

How can I use "immediately followed" in a sentence?

Use "immediately followed" to indicate that something happened directly after something else. For instance, "The concert ended, and it was "immediately followed" by a fireworks display".

What are some alternatives to "immediately followed"?

You can use phrases like "instantly succeeded", "directly ensued", or "came on the heels of", depending on the specific context and desired level of formality.

Is there a difference between "immediately followed" and "subsequently happened"?

"Immediately followed" indicates a very short time between two events, whereas "subsequently happened" implies that the events occurred at a later time. The former is more direct and quicker in succession than the latter.

Can I use "immediately followed" to describe events happening at the same time?

No, "immediately followed" should not be used to describe events that happen at the same time. It indicates a sequence where one event is completed before the next one begins. For simultaneous actions, consider using phrases like “occurred simultaneously” or “happened concurrently”.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: