illustrated with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "illustrated with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing a figure or graphic that supports or clarifies a point you are making. For example, "We can see the trends in the data more clearly when it is illustrated with a graph."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

illustrated with words.

The New Yorker

The grim prophecies are illustrated with statistics.

The New York Times - Books

Story is illustrated with a spot.

The New Yorker

The story is illustrated with verve.

The Guardian - Books

The book is illustrated with exquisite woodcuts.

The New York Times

His travels are illustrated with expansive clarity.

The Guardian - Books

But it was illustrated with their photographs.

The Guardian

Satirical story with footnotes & illustrated with drawings.

The New Yorker

The list was illustrated with the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade.

The New Yorker

Gág's stories are written and illustrated with precision.

The New Yorker

It is profusely illustrated with period drawings, paintings and photographs.

The New York Times - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "illustrated with" to clearly indicate when visual aids or examples are being used to enhance understanding or provide context.

Common error

Avoid overuse of passive voice when using "illustrated with". Instead of saying "The point is illustrated with this example", consider "This example illustrates the point" for a more direct and engaging style.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "illustrated with" functions as a verb phrase, specifically a past participle verb acting as an adjective. It modifies a noun, indicating that the noun is accompanied or clarified by examples, images, or other supporting visuals. As Ludwig AI pointed out, it is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

44%

News & Media

42%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "illustrated with" is a versatile and grammatically sound way to indicate the use of visual aids, examples, or supporting data to enhance understanding. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and common usage across various contexts, particularly in science and news media. When using the phrase, remember to maintain an active voice where appropriate and consider the subtle differences between "illustrated with" and alternatives like "exemplified by" or "demonstrated by". By following these guidelines, you can effectively communicate your ideas and enhance the clarity of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

exemplified by

Uses specific instances to represent a broader concept or category.

demonstrated by

Highlights the act of showing or proving something, often with a practical display or evidence.

clarified by

Emphasizes the act of making something more understandable, instead of enriching with visuals.

shown with

A simpler phrasing that may lack the nuance of providing additional context or clarity.

supported by

Focuses on providing evidence or backing up a claim, rather than visual or illustrative aid.

reinforced by

Implies that something is strenghtened or supported, can be used instead of demonstrated by.

accompanied by

Suggests a supplementary addition alongside the main subject, not necessarily clarifying it.

detailed with

Implies that the phrase is elaborated or expanded with additional info.

presented with

Focuses on showcasing or offering something, without the implicit clarifying effect.

enhanced by

Suggests that something is improved or augmented, without necessarily being visually represented.

FAQs

How can I use "illustrated with" in a sentence?

You can use "illustrated with" to indicate that something is being clarified or supported by examples, images, or data. For example: "The report was "illustrated with" several charts and graphs."

What are some alternatives to "illustrated with"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "exemplified by", "demonstrated by", or "supported by".

Is it correct to say "illustrated by" instead of "illustrated with"?

While both can be correct, "illustrated with" often implies that something is being accompanied or enhanced by the illustrations, whereas "illustrated by" typically refers to the artist or creator of the illustrations.

What's the difference between "illustrated with examples" and "illustrated by examples"?

"Illustrated with examples" suggests that the examples are integral to understanding the concept. "Illustrated by examples" is less common and may imply the examples themselves are doing the illustrating, which is less direct.