identity of

USAGE SUMMARY

"identity of" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
It is typically used to refer to the specific aspects or characteristics that define someone or something. Example: "The identity of the suspect is still unknown." In this sentence, "identity of" is used to indicate that the specific details or qualities that make the suspect who they are are still not known.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The identity of the father was uncertain.

The New Yorker

That was the identity of my generation".

The New Yorker

The inconsistency of identity, of personality.

The New Yorker

The identity of the trader remained unclear.

The New York Times

The identity of this queen is uncertain.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The identity of her husband?

The New York Times

The identity of the evildoer?

The New York Times - Books

The real identity of "Damon" remains uncertain.

The Guardian - Books

The identity of the other wife?

The New York Times

"That's the identity of our secondary.

The New York Times - Sports

The identity of the hijackers remained unclear.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "identity of" when referring to the specific attributes, characteristics, or qualities that define someone or something. Be clear about what aspect of identity you are discussing.

Common error

Avoid unnecessarily complex sentence structures when using "identity of". Sometimes a simpler phrasing, such as replacing it with 'identifying' or just 'identity', can improve clarity and readability.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "identity of" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase. It connects a noun or pronoun to its identifying characteristics or source. Ludwig AI indicates this phrase is correct and commonly used in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

31%

Wiki

11%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

7%

Huffington Post

5%

Forbes

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "identity of" serves as a prepositional phrase used to specify the attributes or source related to the characterization of something or someone. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage. Predominantly found in "News & Media" and "Science", it maintains a formal to neutral register. To enhance clarity, avoid overuse in unduly complex sentence constructions. Alternatives like "identification of" can offer simpler phrasing in certain contexts. Remembering these points helps ensure accurate and effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

identification of

This alternative focuses more directly on the act of identifying something or someone.

determination of

This phrase emphasizes the process of finding out or establishing the identity.

establishment of

This highlights the act of creating or confirming someone's or something's identity.

characteristics of

This shifts the focus to the specific attributes that define the identity.

nature of

This alternative suggests exploring the inherent qualities that constitute the identity.

essence of

This emphasizes the fundamental or intrinsic qualities defining the identity.

particulars of

This phrase suggests a focus on the specific details that make up the identity.

details of

Similar to 'particulars of', but it broadens the focus to all relevant information.

persona of

This is mainly relevant when discussing a person's public image or identity.

individuality of

This highlights the unique characteristics that define someone or something.

FAQs

How do I use "identity of" in a sentence?

Use "identity of" when you want to specify the qualities, characteristics, or source related to who or what someone or something is. For example, "The identity of the attacker remains a mystery."

What can I say instead of "identity of"?

You can use alternatives like "identification of", "characteristics of", or "nature of" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "identity of" or simply "identity"?

Using "identity" alone works well when you don't need to emphasize a specific relationship. Use "identity of" when you need to highlight the relationship between an identity and another element or concept. For instance, compare "national identity" with "the identity of the nation".

What's the difference between "identity of" and "the identifier of"?

"Identity of" refers to the qualities or characteristics that define someone or something. "The identifier of", on the other hand, points to a specific piece of information (like a code or name) used to recognize something uniquely.