Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

identification of

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"identification of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are referring to the action of determining the origin or nature of something. For example, "The identification of genetic markers is key to understanding the cause of the disease."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

2. Identification of parties.

Identification of similarity parameters.

Identification of payee.

Identification of relevant steps.

Identification of Barriers.

Identification of novel TAS2R16 agonists.

Science & Research

Nature

Identification of ligand-specific structures.

Science & Research

Nature

Immunohistochemical identification of neuronal types.

Science & Research

Nature

Accurate identification of this illness is crucial.

News & Media

The New York Times

§ 51.231 Identification of legal authority.

§ 51.162 Identification of responsible agency.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "identification of", ensure the object being identified is clearly specified to avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of saying "the identification was successful", specify "the identification of the gene was successful".

Common error

Avoid using "identification of" when a simpler verb like "identifying" or "finding" would suffice. For example, instead of "the identification of solutions", consider "identifying solutions" for a more concise sentence.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "identification of" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It describes the act or process of identifying something. Ludwig AI confirms this through numerous examples where it precedes a noun phrase specifying what is being identified.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

50%

Academia

38%

News & Media

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "identification of" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase across diverse fields, particularly in science and academia. According to Ludwig AI, it serves to emphasize the process of recognizing or determining the nature or identity of something. While it's generally correct and usable, aiming for conciseness by employing alternatives like "identifying" or "detection of" can enhance writing clarity. Remember to specify the object being identified and avoid overuse in redundant contexts. By following these guidelines, writers can effectively leverage "identification of" to communicate with precision and impact.

FAQs

How can I use "identification of" in a sentence?

The phrase "identification of" typically precedes a noun or noun phrase. For instance, "The project focused on the "identification of" /s/new+therapeutic+targets for cancer treatment" or "Accurate "identification of" /s/this+illness is crucial for effective intervention".

What are some alternatives to "identification of"?

Depending on the context, alternatives to "identification of" include "determining the nature of", "establishing the identity of", or simply "finding" or "detecting".

When is it best to use "identification of" versus a simpler term like "finding"?

"Identification of" is suitable when emphasizing the process of formally recognizing or determining something. "Finding" is more appropriate when simply referring to the act of locating something without the need for formal recognition.

Is "identification for" ever correct instead of "identification of"?

No, "identification for" is not grammatically correct in most contexts where "identification of" is used. "Identification for" might be correct in specific scenarios, such as "identification methods for security purposes", but it is far less common.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: